In reply to Bob Cook's message of Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:22:16 -0800: Hi, I think the 1-2 nm size came from Axil, not from me.
>Robin-- > >If carbon nano tubes are the quantum cavity you refer to their dimensions >can be greater--maybe up to 14 to 16 manometers. A mixture of sizes may >allow absorption at may varied frequencies depending upon the temperature. >The following paper addresses CNT size effects: > >http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1202/1202.1328.pdf > >It was identified by MarkI-zero point two days ago. > >Bob > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[email protected]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:37 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper" > > >In reply to Bob Cook's message of Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:58:10 -0800: >Hi, >[snip] >> These local vortex formations provide templates upon which the solitons >> will condense. These quantum cavities absorbed both gamma radiation from >> nuclear reactions and infrared radiation from the reactor structure and >> amalgamate these waves into a XUV soliton waveform resonant with the >> diameter of the quantum cavity: about 1 to 2 nanometers. >> >...this is on the order of hundreds of eV, perhaps coincidentally the same >energy range one might also expect from either Hydrino formation or IRH. > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
