Mark--
Its hard to keep track of who says what in these threads.
Sorry, Thanks for the correction.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "MarkI-ZeroPoint" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper"
Bob:
It wasn't I, Jones referenced that paper in a posting dated:
Tue 3/4/2014 8:11 AM.
Credit where credit is due...
-mark iverson
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 1:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper"
Robin--
If carbon nano tubes are the quantum cavity you refer to their dimensions
can be greater--maybe up to 14 to 16 manometers. A mixture of sizes may
allow absorption at may varied frequencies depending upon the temperature.
The following paper addresses CNT size effects:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1202/1202.1328.pdf
It was identified by MarkI-zero point two days ago.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper"
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:58:10 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
These local vortex formations provide templates upon which the solitons
will condense. These quantum cavities absorbed both gamma radiation from
nuclear reactions and infrared radiation from the reactor structure and
amalgamate these waves into a XUV soliton waveform resonant with the
diameter of the quantum cavity: about 1 to 2 nanometers.
...this is on the order of hundreds of eV, perhaps coincidentally the same
energy range one might also expect from either Hydrino formation or IRH.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
