In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:23:09 -0500: Hi, [snip]
I was under the impression that DGT started with a 1 Tesla field that they created themselves, and that the experiment itself increased this to 1.6 T. IOW a 60% increase. It is common for ferromagnetic materials to increase the field strength of a magnet when inserted into the core of a coil, due to the materials electron spins aligning themselves with the field, so I would not be surprised to find that the imposed field increased by 60% when Ni was introduced to the imposed field. Have I misunderstood the DGT report? >Like you, any one of us can only do so much of what is required. To come >up with an all inclusive theory, we must trust the word and the work done >by others. > >I must admit that I trust DGT. So far, their experimental observation about >magnetic field strength has no impact on the theory (HEMI) that they put >forward. > >They have no theroritical based interest in misleading us to advance their >theory base on Dr. Kims work. > >Like us, DGT is simply amazed at the magnetic nature of their experimental >find but have not connected it to HEMI in any way. This is hard to >understand. > >On the part of DGT, there is no self interest in tossing an almost >unbelievable finding into their finding and in fact this finding undercuts >HEMI. > >In fact such a finding is a major distraction. They really need to do a >major rethink of their experimental position on HEMI and BEC as per Dr. Kim. > > >On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> > These Nanoplasmonic experiments with uranium can be done inexpensively, >> why can't Ed replicate these experiments? >> >> Because I have only two hands and no financial support. If you want this >> replicated, I suggest you hire someone to do this. >> >> Ed Storms >> >> >> >> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
