what about the electrons in that stripping, and the neutrino... does it stay positives? what is the equation?
naively I imagine np+np -> 4p + 2e +2!v is it still positive? electrons cost 511kev to create, about the gain... I don't master enough to be sure of anything 2014-03-27 18:58 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene <[email protected]>: > Attention water-heads ("Mizuno" literally means 'From Water') > > > > Here is another weird and wonderful implication of the recent Mizuno paper > which would explain how two deuterons react in such a way as to provide > more energy than chemical but with few gamma rays and few neutrons - and > with lots of hydrogen as the ash. > > > > Imagine that: hydrogen is the ash ! To explain this we must think outside > the box, which is the same as inside the cavity. > > > > This could be called a QM "bi-stripping" reaction. It can only happen with > two deuterons, and probably with the added requirement of nanocavity > confinement. Heisenberg is involved. > > > > When a neutron decays to a proton, about 1.3 MeV would be released. But > the extended half-life of free neutrons means this energy is not normally > available instantaneously. This is where QM enters the picture. > > > > The mass of the deuteron is 1875.613 MeV. The mass of a free neutron plus > a free proton is 1877.8374 - thus about 2.2 MeV would be required (to be > supplied via kinetic energy) in order to split the deuteron - without QM > being involved. The net deficit of this reaction is thus ~900 keV. > > > > This is why no one ever imagined Oppenheimer Philips as being relevant > before now. It looks endothermic, without Heisenberg. However, one can > surmise that with time alteration or compression - if two deuterons > approach each other so that both undergo the OP splitting reaction > instantaneously as a result of the single impact, then it is possible that > the same 2.2 MeV of kinetic energy results in a net energy release of 2.6 > MeV (from two neutron decays) but the two neutrons have decayed to protons > instantly, instead of with an extended half-life. This could indeed be an > expected result of Heisenberg uncertainty and other QM principles. > > > > Thus the net reaction gain is 400 keV. The big stretch of the imagination > is that the same kinetic energy can split both atoms at the same time using > what can only be called a quantum time alteration and borrowed energy from > the net reaction. Admittedly, this is a stretch, but isn't everything in QM? > > > > Adding QM into the mix, we can surmise that most of the 2.2 kinetic energy > deficit is supplied from the net energy of the two neutron decay reactions, > not a single decay - and also that the normal half life of neutrons is > greatly compressed to supply this net energy of 2.6 MeV (2 x 1.3 MeV) as > part of the borrowed input. > > > > Only then is the net reaction gainful and the beauty of it is that 4 > resultant protons carry off the 400 keV net gain - with approximately 100 > keV in kinetic energy each, which is at a level which is low enough and > consistent with low or no gamma... and bremsstrahlung would not be high > energy either. That there would appear to be few gamma rays (occasional) is > a given. However, the ash of the reaction is that there would appear to be > a lot of hydrogen which replaces the deuterium - which was there at the > start. > > > > If you don't buy this explanation (that kinetic energy can be shared in > such a way that two approaching deuterons are stripped at exactly the same > time, and instantly decay) then there are alternatives. They will come up > in a later post. In fact, to place this in context - there could be many > gainful reactions happening at the same time. > > > > This bi-stripping hypothesis is all of a few minutes old, so it needs to > be vetted... but hey, in QM terms - a few minutes is a virtual eternity J > > > > The free neutron mass is slightly larger than that of a proton. The > lifetime is about 15 minutes. 939.565378 MeV compared to 938.272046 MeV > would be the standard values. > > > > This is why the Oppenheimer Philips (stripping) reaction could be > extremely important to LENR and it has been almost neglected in the past. > > > > It should be noted that in the parallel thread on vortex today (Magnetic > permeability and LENR) that energy depletion of the deuteron, in the nickel > cavity due to spin coupling, could lower the binding energy so that the OP > effect happens at a much lower threshold than usual. > > >
