I would go with inverse Rydberg or "relativistic hydrogen" and gravitational coupling keeping in mind that gravitational at the nanoscale is more like segregation of virtual particle density related to geometry and that relativistic doesn't have to mean near C spatial displacement of an object..just like an object at the bottom of a gravity well can have equivalent acceleration the geometrically suppressed hydrogen gas can have equivalent negative acceleration at the top of a warp [suppression zone] relative to the macro world isotropy we consider our baseline. Fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Is Mizuno poining at Ryberg matter or not? Bob-- What is your understanding of the energy transfer mechanism involved in the evanescent coupling (non-radiative) phenomena? The ones we know about are vibrational lattice damping, spin coupling, spin orbit force coupling, electro-weak force coupling, gravitational coupling and maybe others unknown. Some of these may be controlled more or less by the local magnetic field which change the parameters of allowed transitions as exist in a quantum system with its quantum energy states, whatever they may be at any instant particular instant in time. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Higgins<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 5:56 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is Mizuno poining at Ryberg matter or not? Keep in mind that "Rydberg matter" does not normally describe "shrunken" hydrogen. Shrunken hydrogen has its electron in a reduced orbital at an energy state below the normally accepted ground state. This has been variously described as "inverse Rydberg" and "fractional Rydberg" or "hydrino" (Mills) states that are all below ground level. Mills describes multiple fractional states below ground level. There is an older reference to a Deep Dirac Level or DDL that is also a shrunken hydrogen. Most normal hydrogen states, including the normal (non-fractional) Rydberg states are entered and departed via emission/absorbtion of a photon of the correct energy level. Transitions to fractional Rydberg states (below normal ground level) can only achieved by evanescent coupling (non-radiative) to the atom according to Mills. Incontrovertible evidence for the fractional states has never been provided, though Mills makes a pretty good case. It may turn out that LENR could prove the existence of these fractional states. I will leave it to the more skilled theorists to say whether the shrunken states (fractional Rydberg) of hydrogen are implicated in LENR - but to me, the possibility does seem compelling. In Dr. Storms' theory, when his hydroton is formed in the NAE (crack), he describes the hydroton as removing the energy in the hydrogen atom before it fuses such that there is little energy remaining to be released when the fusion occurs. One way to successively remove the energy in such a hydroton configuration may be the progressive conversion to an ever more fractional state, and when Mills' minimum size of 1/137 is reached, fusion occurs. The hydroton configuration could provide the evanescent coupling needed to take the H to fractional levels. Bob Higgins On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Teslaalset <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Recent positive responses to Mizuno's work present recently at MIT by Yoshino made me look at his work presented at ICCF 18<http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTmethodofco.pdf> last year. In section 1.1 of this presentation Mizuno hints in my view at Rydberg matter but does not actually mention Rydberg. Bullet #4 and #5 indicates he thinks some involved atoms schrink in size and in bullet #10 he indicates that alkali and alkaline-earth elements show identical effects. Looking to general description of Rydberg atoms, it is indicated that Rydberg atoms are extremely large with loosely bound valence electrons. Any opinions on these observations/assumptions?
