Axil--

If an electron is standing still, is it a wave?  I think it must have some 
kinetic energy to become a wave.   Lambda (l) = h/mv.  If v is 0, l goes to 
infinity.  

Bob 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 9:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention


  SPP can be packed together in a volume in unlimited numbers because SPP are 
BOSONS.. This produces a EMF soliton with a huge or unlimited amplitude like a 
laser. In fact, SPP can produce strong laser radiation when the quasi-particle 
breaks up.



  On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

    The electron and the photon are particles, but they are waves too. When the 
wavelengths  of these two particles are equal, they combine together to form a 
composite waveform.


    By convention, when thought of as particles, these particles combine into 
quasi- particles. This is why the SPP is said to be a quasi-particle.



    On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

      Axil--

      Why do you say a SPP is a wave--I think of it as a particle--like you say 
a BOSON.  Are  BOSONs  also unlimited in their loquaciousness  as well as 
strength?

      Bob 
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Axil Axil 
        To: vortex-l 
        Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:55 PM
        Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention


        The Surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) is a hybrid infrared/electron 
combo wave. It has spin and most important ...IT IS A BOSON.. BOSON means 
unlimited strength. That wave based spin produces the anapole magnetic field 
when the SPP forms a soliton in a vortex.



        On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> 
wrote:

          Axil Axil--

          You finally have seen the light--the EMF that is.

          I joined this Blog a little over 2 months ago with a  bias that spin 
and magnetism are the keys to LENR.  I have been exposed to a lot of ideas and 
some facts.  I am even more biased now.  

          Spin is an energy with a direction and can be controlled by a 
magnetic field.  The magnetic field establishes the amount of energy (via spin) 
a particle can hold and the differential amounts it can give up or take up.   
The old timers thought the energy was akin to a spinning top's energy and 
angular momentum.  I am beginning to think of it as a mini Vortex of a magnetic 
field more or less  locally confined within a volume of space--the particle 
boundary.   

          Clarifying what is happening is just a matter of thinking inside the 
boundary. 

          Bob
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Axil Axil 
            To: vortex-l 
            Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:05 PM
            Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention


            Based on the time honored LENR causation concept of charge 
screening, LENR is posited to be an EMF process. Since charge is emergent from 
spin, and spin is the origin on magnetism. therefore.  LENR is a magnetic based 
process at its root.



            On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Eric Walker 
<[email protected]> wrote:

              On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Bob Cook 
<[email protected]> wrote:


                Ahern seems to believe magnetic effects are at the heart of 
LENR phenomena.


              Each experimentalist and theorist has a pet theory about what is 
going on.  What is important is whether one is able to subjugate one's personal 
hunches to a more objective and systematic pursuit of what is going on.

                He does not think nuclear reactions are involved.

              This should be a warning sign that Dr. Ahern might not be seeing 
much of interest.  What seems clear is that some researchers get very 
pronounced results.


              Eric









Reply via email to