Does it make sense?

Somewhat, however, my point is that the nuclear isomer seems to be a
possible explanation as to why we don't see gammas and neutrons (and dead
grad students). some of the mechanisms on the Wikipedia page explain how the
energy is channeled to other 'things' instead of the usual emission of a
gamma photon.

 

-mark

 

From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nuclear isomer

 

Mark--

 

A simple definition of a metastable  nuclear isomer and how they can be
created is warranted to further the understanding of your comments. 

 

As I understand, an isomer is merely a nuclear energy state above the ground
state for any given nucleus.  Such energy states I think can be spin states
above the ground spin states.  There may be other electric dipole isomer
states and magnetic dipole states both of which are above the ground energy
state of the nucleus in question.  The magnetic and electric dipole states
can be created by resonant input energy either magnetic or electric or both,
I believe.  Quadrapole interactions are also possible.  The magnetic
resonance is behind the mechanism of MRI machines.   (As I recently noted GE
has just announced a hyperdipole imaging device using C-13 as any excitable
nucleus.  They even call their device  SPINlab.)  The name suggests isomeric
spin states of C-13 or electric or magnetic dipole states are being
created.)  I don't understand the quantum energy levels possible as a result
of strong nuclear force coupling between neutrons and protons.  

 

The key question is what are the rules for creating metastable states--ones
that cannot decay back to the ground states after energy stimulation is
removed?  Energetic  coupling to electrons via acceleration in an electric
field or spin coupling may be possible.  Although a dislodged inner electron
would not create a gamma (associated with nuclear decay) x-rays would occur.


 

Mark--Does this make any sense?

 

Bob

----- Original Message ----- 

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <mailto:zeropo...@charter.net>  

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:33 PM

Subject: RE: [Vo]:Nuclear isomer

 

To follow up, another interesting tidbit in that Wikipage is this:

 

-------------------------------

High spin suppression of decay

 

The most common mechanism for suppression of gamma decay of excited nuclei,
and thus the existence of a metastable isomer for the nucleus, is lack of a
decay route for the excited state that will change nuclear angular momentum
(along any given direction) by the most common amount of 1 quantum unit
(h-bar) of spin angular momentum. Such a change is necessary to emit a gamma
photon, which has a spin of 1 unit in this system.

-------------------------------

 

All together now.

  Where, oh where, did the gamma rays go...

  Oh where, oh where can they be!

 

-mark iverson

 

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Nuclear isomer

 

Vorts,

 

A Fellow Friend of Fringe Facts sent me to gander at this:

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_isomer

 

And here is what caught my attention that might apply to LENR/CF:

 

-----------------------

Internal conversion

 

Metastable isomers may also decay by internal conversion - 

  ***a process in which the energy of nuclear de-excitation is NOT emitted
as a gamma ray***, 

but instead used to accelerate one of the inner electrons of the atom, so
that it leaves at high speed and energy. This result occurs because inner
atomic electrons penetrate the nucleus, where they are subject to the
intense electric fields which result when the protons of the nucleus
re-arrange in a different way. In nuclei which are far from stability in
energy, still other decay modes are known.

-----------------------

 

An added bonus was this statement which supports my model for electrons as
dipole-like oscillations which either skirt, and/or pass thru the nucleus.

".because inner atomic electrons penetrate the nucleus"

 

I guess it's going to take a 2x4 to the head to get the science mainstream's
attention. or, to interrupt their mesmerized state brought on by
indoctrination to the current paradigm.

 

-mark iverson

 

Reply via email to