Much depends upon how the reaction energy is stored within the nucleus.  Does 
anyone recall seeing good evidence that it is stored as spin energy of the 
nucleons?  Large nuclei such as nickel likely have much of the energy hidden 
within the distribution of the protons and neutrons that can take on different 
forms.  Helium or deuteron are too simple to have these sinks as far as I know. 
 I am not aware of the possible distributions and magnitudes of spin energy 
storage but that dovetails nicely with our thoughts about interaction with 
large magnetic fields.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: mixent <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, May 14, 2014 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nuclear isomer


In reply to  MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Tue, 13 May 2014 22:25:37 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]

If you go back through the archives, you will see that I have mentioned a
modified form of IC frequently in connection with Hydrino fusion.
However, as Jones pointed out, it does have the problem of producing easily
detected bremsstrahlung, which is not in evidence.

>And here is what caught my attention that might apply to LENR/CF:
>
> 
>
>-----------------------
>
>Internal conversion
>
> 
>
>Metastable isomers may also decay by internal conversion - 
>
>  ***a process in which the energy of nuclear de-excitation is NOT emitted
>as a gamma ray***, 
>
>but instead used to accelerate one of the inner electrons of the atom, so
>that it leaves at high speed and energy. This result occurs because inner
>atomic electrons penetrate the nucleus, where they are subject to the
>intense electric fields which result when the protons of the nucleus
>re-arrange in a different way. In nuclei which are far from stability in
>energy, still other decay modes are known.
>
>-----------------------
>
> 
>
>An added bonus was this statement which supports my model for electrons as
>dipole-like oscillations which either skirt, and/or pass thru the nucleus.
>
>".because inner atomic electrons penetrate the nucleus"
>
> 
>
>I guess it's going to take a 2x4 to the head to get the science mainstream's
>attention. or, to interrupt their mesmerized state brought on by
>indoctrination to the current paradigm.
>
> 
>
>-mark iverson
>
> 
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html


 

Reply via email to