H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:

> He claimed that DGT learned Rossi's trade secret. He did not say DGT
> "stole" it. He stated this publicly because he wanted to persuade people
> that DGT could build a working reactor without Rossi's help.
>

He said they examined the powder with a mass spec in violation of
agreements with Rossi, and without Rossi's knowledge. That is theft of
trade secrets. Some of the people negotiating with him were appalled, as
was I. Maybe you do not think this is theft, and maybe Xanthoulis does not
think it is, but by the standards of U.S. business ethics, it is theft and
will surely mean Defkalion is not free to sell the product and they will be
tied up in civil suits for years if they try to sell it.

I am pretty sure there will be no civil suit for trade secret theft,
because as far as I know they do not have a working product. Maybe they
tried to steal the secret, but they failed.

The people at Defkalion Europe (DE) declared themselves out of business as
soon they discovered the claims were false and the machine does not produce
excess heat. I and others have praised them for doing this. In point of
fact, they had to do that. Any other course of action would be criminal
fraud. Once you know your product does not work, you have stop selling it.
They deserve praise for doing this quickly and decisively, and for warning
their customers. They deserve praise for telling Defkalion, and for
publishing the report.

Defkalion has known their claims are wrong at least since the day after
ICCF18, and probably much longer. Yet they are still in business, and they
still claim it works. If it was was not fraud up until ICCF18, it surely is
now.

(It might have been an idiotic mistake up until ICCF18, but I think that is
very unlikely, given all the times I and others warned them to do reality
check tests.)

- Jed

Reply via email to