I allege the Gamberale was aiding another company to produce a LENR device while in a joint venture with DGT and that is way the Mose/DGT joint venture was dissolved.
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Let us extend this line of logic a bit more. > > > > If a partner of one joint venture was engaged with another company while > still in that partnership to produce a device that is similar in function > to the product that was the commercialized object of the original > partnership, is that side activity to replicate the function of that > original product with cooperation of the other company an attempt to steal > the intellectual property of the original partnership. > > > > > > Is the aggrieved partner of the original partnership justified in breaking > the original partnership if they become aware of the outside activities of > the other partner in violation of the original partnership? > > > > For a partner in a partnership, who is trying to duplicate the > functionality of a product with another party the act of stealing > intellectual property? > > > > IMHO, this is similar to unfaithfulness in a marriage. Is divorce based on > unfaithfulness justified? > > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Really? In Italy, he was granted. Only there. An it is extremely unlikely >>> that he will get anywhere . . . >>> >> >> His ability to make the machine work is intellectual property whether he >> has a patent or not. It is a trade secret. Stealing a trade secret is >> unethical if not illegal. Xanthoulis was bragging in the press that he >> steals trade secrets from his business partners. You would be crazy to sign >> a contract with someone who says that. >> >> Rossi may file for another patent, and he may get it. So he still has >> intellectual property in that sense as well. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
