Eric--
Note the following: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/06/20/empirically-incontrovertible-evidence-for-d-d-cold-fusion-seen-in-accelerator-experiments/ This item also suggests that the electrons of the metallic lattice are important, although it indicates redistribution of energy via photons. I still think spin coupling could work and would be consistent with the lack of energetic photons escaping the reactor and being recorded. The orbital angular momentum associated with p electrons in the metal lattice is significantly different than that for s electrons. This idea may be behind Ed Storms theory (non-nuclear) that he is working to publish from last report. It may be Ed got a ticket to go to Europe to work with the Swedes etal.??? Separately, I have been trying to figure out whether spin and angular momentum are covered by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. I know momentum, p, and kinetic energy, e, are considered, but what about the energy associated with spin angular momentum. It may be that spin energy is strictly confined to specific quanta for all systems and that there can be no uncertainty. This would make engineering resonances in a magnetic field possible with good electronic controls. Coupling and resonances seem to go hand in hand. Bob Sent from Windows Mail From: Eric Walker Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 10:47 AM To: [email protected] On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: It would be great if we could find one mechanism that provides the total set of transmutation produces seen in LENR. ... The Philips reaction is not a "one reaction fit all" solution. Agreed. The data do not match simple neutron capture. There would have to be other reactions as well (e.g., successive proton capture, and pd and dd reactions). Eric
