I have heard rumors that Gamberale is a thief and a liar. To the validity of this rumor, I cannot hold an informed opinion. At this juncture I cannot really know who to believe. This uncertainty in the motives of any single source is why reliable news organization must get multiple conformations from highly trusted sources who are known to have no apparent agenda toward the news item in question before they spread any news derived from those trusted sources.
On point that is troubling is news that Gamberale is still working in the LENR field. This implies a continuing conflict of interest regarding his opinions and assertions. Do you now have other reliable sources who will go on the record to confirm what Gamberale asserts? On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Why is Rossi so worried about Defkalion? It seems that Rossi's Defkalion >> concerns are transcendent far above all other competitors. >> > > I think he is upset by them, but not worried. He feels that he was misled > and abused by them. I do not think he considers them competitors. He does > not think they have anything. Based on the Gamberale report, I do not think > they have anything either. Maybe some other report I have not seen shows > they have something after all. But, so far, only Gamberale has published, > and he is totally negative. > > Rossi is worried that a bad reputation for the field will make it harder > for him. I get that. To some extent, opposition to cold fusion is good for > him. It gives him a chance to work without competition. But, when the > opposition ramps up too high, and there is too much hysteria in the mass > media, that hurts him. For example, if the Swedish television reporter had > her way, the second ELFORSK test would be abandoned. That would be bad for > Rossi. He needs that test. He needs some degree of credibility. > > - Jed > >
