> There is only one open question: Was this a stupid mistake, or was it > deliberate fraud? It is hard to judge, but I do not think it makes much > difference. Either way, a person would be crazy to deal with the company. >
There could be another complication involved in the testing of the NiH reactor that you have not considered. My theory of the NiH reaction predicts powerful output of both Radio frequency(RF) and manganic radiation. The power output of this type of radiation from an NiH reactor may actually exceed the thermal output of the NiH reactor. Any electrical based sensors and/or test equipment put within range of this powerful EMF radiation could produce invalid readings. The NiH reactor may need to be tested were all the sensors are placed in a RF protected space remote from the reactor. IMHO, Rossi will not allow the testers of his reactor to reveal this difficulty in testing the NiH reactor because he may believe that such information will reveal the exact nature of his reaction. I believe that the use of a laser based thermometer capable of remote temperature reading used in the first Rossi test was meant to mitigate the testing problems caused by massive EMF emissions. Well insolated piping running carrying input and output coolant flow exclusivly into an RF protected room far removed from the reactor may be one possible way to protect the test from possible distortions imposed on test equipment from EMF interference. Just imagine how alien difficult it would be to run calorimetric test equipment inside and operating MRI machine. It is likely that Gamberale was not away of this *idiocynrocy implicate *in the NiH reactor and his test was flawed because of it. Not all invalid experimental results are caused by fraud or stupidity. Sometimes dealing with the unknown may play a role.
