Here is more help to support my memory http://www.lenr-forum.com/old-forum/showthread.php?2185-Defkalion-observe-Huge-magnetic-fields-(1-Tesla)-inside-the-reactor
on his blog, Matt lewans report <http://matslew.wordpress.com/2013/07/24/comments-on-defkalion-reactor-demo-in-milan> what Defkalion CTO said I forgot to say that according to CTO John Hadjichristos there are HUGE magnetic fields inside the reactor as a result of the reaction, in the order of 1 Tesla if I remember right, possibly due to extremely strong currents over very short distances. Hadjichristos says *the field is shielded by double Faraday cages*, probably the reactor body and the external metal cover outside the heat insulation. emphasis added On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Refreshing my memory as follows: > > https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/newvortex/conversations/topics/584 > > <Snip> > Additional information was provided, that Defkalion had seen > disruption of electronic equipment by the device, such as their phone > system being shut down; the measurements reported were with all > shielding removed; normally, they operate the Hyperion with mu-metal > and other shielding, to cut down on EMF interference. It is not > surprising that there could be massive noise, they are stimulating > the reaction through a high voltage applied to those spark plugs used > as convenient feed-thrus at either end of the device. Classic spark > RF signal. Wide-band, mostly illegal nowadays, because of how much > disruption it can create. Devices that can generate this kind of > noise must be shielded, or they will be located and shut down. > <EndSnip> > > I seem to remember that the RF interference during the demo was produced > with a doubly shielded Reactor. > > DGT would not be unwise enough to run that ICCF-18 demo with an unshielded > reactor. > > As in nuclear power where neutrons drive the reaction, neutron radiation > protection is a major issue. In LENR, where EMF drives the reaction, RF > protection will be a major issue. > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am going from memory here which could be misapplied. Anyway, DGT >> remarks associated with the ICCF-18 demo regarding EMF interference leads >> me to the conclusion that during the demo, DGT first became fully aware of >> the full extent of the problems caused by the disruptive power that LENR >> related EMF interference placed on the associated instrumentation during >> NiH testing. >> >> For one thing, DFT observed that the NiH reactor took out the entire >> phone system throughout the building in which they demoed the NiH reactor. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> It is likely that Gamberale was not away of this *idiocynrocy >>>> implicate *in the NiH reactor and his test was flawed because of it. >>>> >>> >>> No, that would not apply during the calibration phase. Gamberale >>> reported spurious excess heat during calibration with the reactor turned >>> off, and also when the flow rate was zero. That cannot be anything but an >>> instrument artifact. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >
