From: Eric Walker
The University testing was done with X-rays ... which would serve to reinflate the fractional species. I have heard some proponents claim that hydrinos are the basis of dark matter. If hydrinos can be reinflated with x-rays, this should cause observable anomalies in the vicinity of x-ray sources (e.g., pulsars, x-ray binaries, etc.). Eric One way to resolve this issue (allowing both hypotheses to be true) is to find the cutoff point beyond which reinflation cannot occur. In Mills theory there are 137 levels of electron orbital “shrinkage” or redundancy. He has made a good case for this process at the first few levels but the net gain is always less than expected from his theory. It could be possible that a proportion of these levels – perhaps the first 7 or first 117 levels, no one knows since there is no evidence either way - are subject to reinflation while the deeper shrinkage is not. In fact, it could be true that only the deepest level – the DDL or deep Dirac level – corresponds to dark matter (making up most of the universe) and that level alone, being the bottom of the ladder - is completely stable. There is good theoretical backing for the DDL from others besides Mills (how neglects it). Mills has stated but not proved that shrinkage is auto-catalytic past a certain level. Thus, in merging Mills with other improvements based on experimental results - we could propose that a categorization of redundant ground states is appropriate, based on these factors: endotherm of formation, exotherm of formation, exotherm of reinflation, and ultimate stability. Since there is fair evidence of soft x-ray emission up to ~120 eV we could use this as the arbitrary threshold level, corresponding to IP level 6-7 in many catalysts, such that we find these general properties for hydrogen orbital redundancy, all of which are consistent with a quasi-Millsean interpretation of reported results: 1) Shrinkage - followed immediately by reinflation is always net gainful, due to inherent asymmetry. However, shrinkage alone is endothermic yet reinflation is instant. 2) The source of energy (for shrinkage) is excess mass of the proton which is spin-coupled to the electron. Protons have a statistical 70 parts per million of excess mass on average. 3) Only that fraction of protons which is above average mass is subject to shrinkage, possibly one third of the protons of any sample. 4) Asymmetry is inherent in the process, and is the result of catalytic action and energy “holes”, such that exotherm on reinflation always exceeds endotherm of shrinkage 5) Lifetime for fractional species is very short when not held within the matrix of a host material – reinflation is immediate. 6) Lifetime (stability) for only the DDL, or deepest level, is essentially infinite (thus it corresponds to a definition of dark matter) 7) “Endotherm of formation” for levels 1-6 decrease per level, just as exotherm on reinflation increases. Thus every level drop is more gainful than the previous. 8) At level 7, shrinkage becomes autocatalytic and exothermic, all the way to the DDL, if reinflation has not occurred. This can only happen on the tail of the distribution. 9) Thus, there is essentially no evidence of fractional hydrogen species existing between level 7 and 137. Any fractional hydrogen species which has been captured in a metal matrix or by another element will be level 6 or higher. END. Now is the time for all of the alternative Mills theories to resurface. Robin has his own page. There should be others popping up if Mills allows free flow of data from whatever demo he delivers.
