On 7/20/14, 8:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
/Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of
thermodynamics, and here he does essentially the same thing./
If the reaction takes place in the lattice, we're definitely
violating the laws of thermodynamics.
***HOW? HOW?? HOW??? Demonstrate it!!! Why is this such a big
friggin deal to you and Ed Storms and why hasn't he LOUDLY proclaimed
it, especially when he he was here on Vortex? If it's such a BIG
friggin deal, why didn't he make a BIG FRIGGIN DEAL about it here on
Vortex?
Hi Kevin, I haven't listened to the interview yet, but I've spent some
time talking with Storms about this. He applies a physics 101
application of thermodynamics to system of particles in a closed
environment. For LENR, the lattice plays the closed environment.
Question: How do nuclear particles converge together in a lattice
vacancy and fuse?
(How does deuterium turn into helium?)
Question: How does an electron gain enough energy to combine with proton?
(782 keV to make neutron)
Where does the energy come from to do this? How does this energy
coalesce in one location at once, without affecting the chemical bonds
that make up the lattice? How does it accumulate over time (it it does)?
Gaining energy in a localized region means it must have been lost
somewhere else from the surrounding area.
But thermodynamics says energy cannot spontaneously accumulate in one
location. Yes, unusual quantum mechanical effects happen. Odd things
can occur once in a while. But, given the number of required reactions
to make the observed heat, it would be a violation of the laws of
thermodynamics to have so many out-of-the-norm events.
That's how I understand what he is saying.
In a nano-environment, separate from the chemical lattice itself
but still a "part" of it in another sense, we can see new high
energy events manifest before altering the NAE before high rates
of nuclear reactions can be achieved.
***What a bunch of bowlsheet.
The nano-crack is a separate space from the lattice. It is a broken
part of the lattice.
As a separate space, it has an environment different from the lattice.
In this environment, nuclei and electrons can be trapped in an unusual
way (the hydroton) in a nanocrack that can't happen in a vacancy.
The hydroton can resonate in a way it wouldn't in the lattice.
These are two examples of how the crack allows behavior that a vacancy won't
When Storms' hydroton in the nano-crack resonates, mass turns to energy
slowly, over time, as opposed to hot fusion which releases mass-energy
all at once.
Hydrotonic fusion happens without fragmentation, as opposed to hot
fusion which does.
Because hydrotonic fusion happens without fragmentation, momentum is not
conserved in the same way that the fusion products of hot fusion will
conserve momentum.
These three differences show some of the criteria and reasoning behind
Storms' insistence upon separating the two phenomenon of hot fusion and
cold fusion.
That's how I understand it at this time.
Ruby
--
Ruby Carat
[email protected]
www.coldfusionnow.org
