*But thermodynamics says energy cannot spontaneously accumulate in one location. Yes, unusual quantum mechanical effects happen. Odd things can occur once in a while. But, given the number of required reactions to make the observed heat, it would be a violation of the laws of thermodynamics to have so many out-of-the-norm events.*
Yes, the heart of the LENR reaction involves energy concentration in violation of thermodynamics: but that is OK because the process is a quantum mechanical one. Surface plasmin polaritons can accumulate in and around the crack to a huge level because they are bosons. Cracks produce SPP solitons. SPP energy storehouse supplies the energy to produce the group fusion of a cluster of hydrogen atoms. To start the study of nanoplasmonics read this intro Stockman_Phys_Today_2011_Physics_behind_Applications http://www.phy-astr.gsu.edu/stockman/data/Stockman_Phys_Today_2011_Physics_behind_Applications.pdf On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/20/14, 8:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> *Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of >> thermodynamics, and here he does essentially the same thing.* >> >> If the reaction takes place in the lattice, we're definitely violating >> the laws of thermodynamics. >> > ***HOW? HOW?? HOW??? Demonstrate it!!! Why is this such a big > friggin deal to you and Ed Storms and why hasn't he LOUDLY proclaimed it, > especially when he he was here on Vortex? If it's such a BIG friggin deal, > why didn't he make a BIG FRIGGIN DEAL about it here on Vortex? > > Hi Kevin, I haven't listened to the interview yet, but I've spent some > time talking with Storms about this. He applies a physics 101 application > of thermodynamics to system of particles in a closed environment. For > LENR, the lattice plays the closed environment. > > Question: How do nuclear particles converge together in a lattice vacancy > and fuse? > (How does deuterium turn into helium?) > > Question: How does an electron gain enough energy to combine with proton? > (782 keV to make neutron) > > Where does the energy come from to do this? How does this energy coalesce > in one location at once, without affecting the chemical bonds that make up > the lattice? How does it accumulate over time (it it does)? > > Gaining energy in a localized region means it must have been lost > somewhere else from the surrounding area. > > But thermodynamics says energy cannot spontaneously accumulate in one > location. Yes, unusual quantum mechanical effects happen. Odd things can > occur once in a while. But, given the number of required reactions to make > the observed heat, it would be a violation of the laws of thermodynamics to > have so many out-of-the-norm events. > > That's how I understand what he is saying. > > In a nano-environment, separate from the chemical lattice itself but >> still a "part" of it in another sense, we can see new high energy events >> manifest before altering the NAE before high rates of nuclear reactions can >> be achieved. >> > ***What a bunch of bowlsheet. > > The nano-crack is a separate space from the lattice. It is a broken part > of the lattice. > As a separate space, it has an environment different from the lattice. > > In this environment, nuclei and electrons can be trapped in an unusual way > (the hydroton) in a nanocrack that can't happen in a vacancy. > The hydroton can resonate in a way it wouldn't in the lattice. > These are two examples of how the crack allows behavior that a vacancy > won't > > When Storms' hydroton in the nano-crack resonates, mass turns to energy > slowly, over time, as opposed to hot fusion which releases mass-energy all > at once. > Hydrotonic fusion happens without fragmentation, as opposed to hot fusion > which does. > Because hydrotonic fusion happens without fragmentation, momentum is not > conserved in the same way that the fusion products of hot fusion will > conserve momentum. > These three differences show some of the criteria and reasoning behind > Storms' insistence upon separating the two phenomenon of hot fusion and > cold fusion. > > That's how I understand it at this time. > > Ruby > > -- > Ruby Carat > [email protected] > www.coldfusionnow.org > >
