OK, interesting. I'm glad to see you have put forward some testable predictions. Ed's theory also puts forward some testable predictions, which is important. I think the easiest ones should be well advertised and investigated more thoroughly by those able in the community. Couple things though:
1) Do you think your jargon and/or theory is anymore sensible sounding to a casual reader than Ed's? 2) Do you have a background in science, a self-taught amateur, or somewhere in between? I don't think it's fair to be completely anonymous when putting forth some sort of grand unified TOE. 3) Is it a bad thing to treat Ed's postulates as a "guide", even if you don't like the idea of what the hydrogen interaction entails? It could serve similarly to Arata's emphasis on the importance of nano-particles. That had and continues to have a lot of clout in the community -- albeit investigations of n-p are mixed. You clearly both agree on the importance of NAE. Why not encourage a vast field-wide exploration of different NAE -- their benefits, drawbacks, and if they offer insight into the reaction itself? We wouldn't even have to know exactly what's going on in the NAE -- just how do we create it and sustain it. 4) I think trying to fit every system into a cold plasma quasi-particle system paradigm is a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the creativity involved, so I don't discourage it. Regards, John On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The cravens ball system may be one of them, What are the others? > > Look at the Piantelli system, He does not heat the hydrogen, but cooper > pairing of hydrogen does occur because two protons enter into the nickel > nucleus as witnessed by the emission of a 6 MeV proton as seen in a cloud > chamber, > > Piantelli uses deuterium to stop his LENR reaction, because untreated > deuterium is NMR active. > > In the Craven ball system, cooper pairing of hydrogen must occur as it > does in Piantelli's system. To prove it as Piantelli does, I suggest > placing the contents of Cravins ball into a cloud chamber and look for > proton emissions.. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Axil -- What about systems that don't make use of a cold plasma that >> generate excess heat? Are these illusory? >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Chemical effects to modify the spin of hydrogen is a doorway through >>> which the LENR reaction must pass before the LENR reaction can occur. >>> Hydrogen is NMR active, its nuclear spin is non zero. A chemical reaction >>> must occur before hydrogen can undergo fusion. The spin of hydrogen must be >>> reduced to 0. >>> The transformation of hydrogen into Rydberg matter is how the spin of >>> hydrogen is made 0. This is accomplished by the production of a hydrogen >>> plasma and its subsequent cooling. A one dimensional crystal structure of >>> hydrogen dust will form in which the nuclear spin of hydrogen is reduced to >>> zero through cooper pairing. >>> >>> It is cooper paired hydrogen that can be a reaction component in the >>> LENR reaction. The LENR reaction will always accompany hydrogen plasma >>> formation either through heat or arc discharge. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:13 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I have not yet read the book. But some of the critique here seams odd. >>>> >>>> To exaggerate it, >>>> The exes heat in the most researched systeme Pd\D are mainly caused by >>>> chemical effect and errors. >>>> If so I think there are a lesser far-reaching assumption that the >>>> results from the lesser known Ni- P/D >>>> systems also are caused by chemical effect and errors. Then the best >>>> conclusion should be that >>>> all cf phenomena are a result by chemical effect and errors. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
