From: Foks0904 

 

As you're alluding to, the tritium production is miniscule. Tritium is produced 
in an alternative reaction pathway in Ed's model, not the main, and it can't be 
produced by the same reaction producing neutrons (which Ed thinks are being 
produced by a separate fracto-fusion phenomenon). The main pathway (d+d in a 
resonating cluster), in agreement with the many who have found approximate 
commensuration between heat/helium, produces heat, helium, and ~ 24 MeV. What's 
the problem exactly? Maybe I'm misunderstanding.

 

Yes! You are completely misunderstanding, so let me try to clarify this issue 
once again.

 

I have no problem with Storms’ theory as it relates to Pd-D. He is the leading 
expert on that field - and we can completely ignore Pd-D in the rest of this 
discussion, insofar as it relates to my criticism of this book.

 

However having said that loud and clear, there is no evidence whatsoever that 
Ni-H is the same or even a similar mechanism to Pd-D. All the best evidence 
indicates that it is a far different beast. These two isotopes are as different 
as night and day or as different as any two elements in the rest of the 
Periodic Table. The mass alone is 2:1.

 

They are worlds apart in almost every physical property, especially magnetic 
and nuclear properties. You should look at protium as being a completely 
different element insofar as LENR is concerned. I can offer you dozens if not 
hundreds of physical and QM properties that are vastly different between the 
two. Please take the time to appreciate how profound are these differences. 

 

If anyone continues to profess that Ni-H is almost the same reaction as Pd-D, 
then they have a very steep path to climb for credibility. There is no data 
supporting relevant LENR connections between the two, yet Ed has chosen to 
treat them as the nearly same so as to bolster the hydroton theory. 

 

That is a terrible choice, and I would be remiss in not continuing to emphasize 
this point ad nauseum apparently, since it never seems to sink in that we have 
two different fields of inquiry here, based on what looks like two different 
elements, except they are isotopes of the same element. 

 

Jones

Reply via email to