Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, something which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like Kim's or Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront a number of problems as you probably know.
Great, let us talk about these problems. I don't see problems. I bet I can explain away these problems. Please give be a shot at that. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It doesn't > contradict what I wrote in the slightest. Yeah, fermions & bosons play > different roles in nuclear process, in all processes actually -- so what? > > Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, something > which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like Kim's or > Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront a number of > problems as you probably know. > > One can just as easily picture a more general process (as I > just highlighted in two different hot fusion systems), absent of different > phase transitions, occurring across different LENR systems. Based on the > evidence so far, I think at best it could be argued that there a draw > exists between the two points of view. > > I appreciate you clearing up any confusions. Take care. > > John > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *From:* Foks0904 . >> >> >> >> …But in many cases, under the umbrella of a general process, such as >> traditional nuclear reactions, despite the difference, the different >> isotopes all tend to follow the same general script in terms of how a >> reaction path progresses and generates effects. >> >> >> >> Not so! Bosons are very different from Fermions – profoundly different >> when it comes to nuclear interaction. >> >> >> >> Enough said? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
