Axil, don't misunderstand, I have definitely read reference material concerning what you're talking about. I find a lot of it interesting and possibly suggestive of what might be going on in plasmatic NiH systems. I don't take any current theory as "the truth" -- yours or Ed's. I have questions about all of them. Like all theories at this point, the idea of plasmon-induced BEC makes a number of leaps of faith & assumptions that I don't think are yet born out by experiment. There's hints, as you've stated, that could be connected, but they don't necessarily have to be. But again, at least it seems like w/ NiH you're trying to put together some experimental tests, which I appreciate & like about what you're doing. Also, I know you trust all the DGT data, but I don't, so we're at an impasse there. I will be very excited if they are actually doing legitimate mass spectroscopy work as promised however.
Regards, John On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will answer the other two, but I also hope that you will attempt to > understand some Nanoplasmonics. Just read the intro, and concentrate on how > hot spots work. Please....I need more targets. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for a bit about your background, I appreciate that. But you still >> have two more to go before the toll is paid I'm afraid. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ok, I will pay your price so here is #2 >>> >>> * Do you have a background in science, a self-taught amateur, or >>> somewhere in between? I don't think it's fair to be completely anonymous >>> when putting forth some sort of grand unified TOE.* >>> >>> I have a degree in physics, but make a living as a system engineer. I >>> specialize in reverse engineering old system's where all info about >>> how they work and what they do has been lose to the ravages of time. I >>> study such systems in order to upgrade them to a new and/or higher level >>> of technology. >>> >>> The skill set that I have perfected over many years is a great help >>> in connecting the dots. I believe I can connect the dots with the best of >>> them. A systems engineer is a generalist and a good one will >>> become competent or expert is any technology that is required to understand >>> how a given system works. >>> >>> As a paranoid, I am afraid of Putin. When Putin finds out that the LENR >>> GUT has destroyed his dreams, his friends, and is removing him from power, >>> he will be pissed and being unknown to him for as long as possible is >>> reassuring to me. >>> >>> And there are many centers of power like Putin. >>> >>> Rossi has said that he has protection. I think that he does >>> but I surly don't. >>> >>> The more people who know how LENR works, the more targets there will be >>> during the big reveal. But no one is willing to take that path. I want more >>> target so I am not the only one. Any volunteers? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I know you can explain them away. That's not much of an accomplishment. >>>> Are you going to take the time to answer the other three questions I posed >>>> to you before we go off on this tangent? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, something >>>>> which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like Kim's or >>>>> Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront a number >>>>> of >>>>> problems as you probably know. >>>>> >>>>> Great, let us talk about these problems. I don't see problems. I bet I >>>>> can explain away these problems. Please give be a shot at that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It doesn't >>>>>> contradict what I wrote in the slightest. Yeah, fermions & bosons play >>>>>> different roles in nuclear process, in all processes actually -- so what? >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, >>>>>> something which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like >>>>>> Kim's or Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront >>>>>> a >>>>>> number of problems as you probably know. >>>>>> >>>>>> One can just as easily picture a more general process (as I >>>>>> just highlighted in two different hot fusion systems), absent of >>>>>> different >>>>>> phase transitions, occurring across different LENR systems. Based on the >>>>>> evidence so far, I think at best it could be argued that there a draw >>>>>> exists between the two points of view. >>>>>> >>>>>> I appreciate you clearing up any confusions. Take care. >>>>>> >>>>>> John >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Foks0904 . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> …But in many cases, under the umbrella of a general process, such >>>>>>> as traditional nuclear reactions, despite the difference, the different >>>>>>> isotopes all tend to follow the same general script in terms of how a >>>>>>> reaction path progresses and generates effects. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not so! Bosons are very different from Fermions – profoundly >>>>>>> different when it comes to nuclear interaction. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Enough said? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
