Hi Lennart, you wrote : "However, if we cannot involve other disciplines LENR cannot be solved. Business reasons and leadership issues are among things that is part of the solution" May you explain what you think/mean?
Thank you. Michel. Le Mercredi 6 août 2014 22h10, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> a écrit : I do agree with you to some extent. Although my experienceis that as soon as the negative part has made its job you need to shift to the positive counterpart. I am not detail oriented per se, although I need to give you some opinion about rule 15. In addition my English migh catch up with me. I need to fully understand limitation. I think you mean limitation as in elimination and then I am just OK. I have no problem with the detail but it is important for my reasoning (and defense of SOD). I do believe one need to find the weaknesses before there is a solution. I alsoo think one need to not ask for them as that makes people defensive and then it is hard to bring them up again. I concentrate on less agonistic stuff and wait to hear the negative as time goes. it never fails to reveal itself and then I can deal with the (agreed) more important issues. I have read your negative statement but I think I found it too hard to write about, maybe I am the lazy one. My initials spells lat and that is the Swedish word for lazy:). The reason I think it is hard to respond to the negative phrases is that it requires pedantry and that is not my fortei. I seldom disagree with your thesis, I just think they have a positive angle either from the very outset or afater an initial negative aproach a positive will (have to) take over. I realize this not Vortex material. However, if we cannot involve other disciplines LENR cannot be solved. Business reasons and leadership issues are among things that is part of the solution. I do recognize that quantum mechanics might have a more direct part in the solution. It is like the Otto motor is more direct to a solution of the popularity of the automobile than issues like saftey, environmental issues as well as other economical factors in general. Well one without the other . . . . On Aug 6, 2014 12:20 PM, "Peter Gluck" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lennart, > > Thanks. Please read the VUCA paper, it is actually a leadership acronym. > I have noticed SOD, really not bad- however see my problrm solving Rule: > > 15. NOT the enhancement of human strengths but the limitation of human > weaknesses is more useful for efficient problem solving. > > > Negative is more important than positive, snd more urgent, see my FQXI essay > > > Peter > > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Peter, >> I am new to science and LENR but Ii am certainly familiar with SWOT. I did >> read your blog and considered a comment but thought that perhaps it is hard >> for people to spee the impact of other , not science fact, so I decided it >> was not worth it. Seems I was right. I think one need to start with SOD to >> get things to grow. Strengths, Opportunities and Dangers.. The simple reason >> I rather use SOD is that nobody will admit to their Ws anyhow. :) >> >> On Aug 6, 2014 11:43 AM, "Peter Gluck" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> 2 years >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Kevin, >>>> >>>> well know who Daniken is 9Tow years older than me and still alive) >>>> The guy from the video Billy Black says similar things but well. >>>> You have to listen a few minutes tp it, if you will get an opinion. >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> started by Erich von Daniken. >>>>> ***You mean this same Erich von Daniken who finished his work first as a >>>>> hotel manager and then in PRISON??? What are you pushing here on Vortex? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> from wikipedia: >>>>> >>>>> The ideas put forth in his books are largely rejected by scientists and >>>>> academics, who categorize his work as pseudohistory and >>>>> pseudoarchaeology.[1][2][3] >>>>> >>>>> Däniken wrote his first book while working as manager of the Hotel >>>>> Rosenhügel in Davos, Switzerland. He was convicted of several financial >>>>> crimes, including fraud, shortly after its publication.[4] The revenue >>>>> from the sales of his book allowed him to repay his debts and leave the >>>>> hotel business. Däniken wrote his second book, Gods from Outer Space, >>>>> while in prison. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I understand you will not read my Blog. Sorry for it but it happens. >>>>>> The greatest part of Humanity does not read it and the consequences >>>>>> are visible. >>>>>> >>>>>> However because I see you are an electrical engineer (as my very best US >>>>>> friend Mike Carrell), I want to ask you a favor. A young reader friend >>>>>> has asked my opinion about this: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nwN0Oj6k0g >>>>>> magnetic vortexes in stone >>>>>> >>>>>> I am a chemical engineer and re electricity magnetism I have always >>>>>> consulted my colleagues. The video is over my head, i am not very fond >>>>>> of such things - started by Erich von Daniken. If you like them, please >>>>>> tell what you think.... >>>>>> Thank you in advance, >>>>>> peter >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, it seems my blog has lost a reader. >>>>>>>> Wish you all we >>>>>>>> Peterll >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***What? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>> Cluj, Romania >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com Iss t
