We see an emperor with no clothes but are afraid to admit it. ***Axil aint no emperor. Go ahead and keep challenging him. I challenged Ed Storms when he was on this list and got very similar treatment as Axil is supposedly giving you.
So, how can we know that you're a bonafide EE? How are your theories stacking up against Axil's? Ed is no longer on this list, but Axil is. Which is more worthy of upholding? Why would you uphold someone who's no longer on this list in favor of someone who is willing to contribute? On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: > Is Axil a Physicist? I thought he claimed to be a systems engineer. > > And since we don't even know if he is truly a systems engineer, how do we > evaluate what he is saying? A lot of things he says goes over my head; and > I'm an engineer (a real degreed, bonafide, practicing Electrical > Engineer). We see an emperor with no clothes but are afraid to admit it. > We do not understand half of what Axil speculates but remain mum lest we > should appear to be less knowledgeable than we would like people to > believe. Hence, Axil's outrageous speculations goes unchallenged and > gains a level of credibility it is not worthy of. I've challenged Axil > to provide explanations to my fundamental objections to his theory but has > received no satisfactory answer, except "read it again". That is a "cop > out". Essentially he is saying, I am not smart enough to understand what > he is saying. I keep wondering how many others also don't understand but > don't mention it. > > On the other hand, when somebody like Ed Storms comes along and offers a > theory, backed by much personal experimental data and exhaustive research, > I think people ought to take heed much more than the unfounded, unsupported > and unbridled speculations of a ""systems engineer????". I've always > wondered why that is seldom the case here in vortex. Have vorticians > acquired a fundamentally anti-science attitude - an attitude that we are > always quick to lament in others? > > I think the first thing we need to know is who Axil really is, and what > his qualifications are. Then we can properly evaluate the merits of what > he is saying. A kid (with the help of wikipedia) can always appear to be a > cancer specialist behind a screen, especially to a roomful of spectators > afraid to point out that the emperor has no clothes. Heck, anyone can > offer unsupported speculations all day long and appear to be a physicist > all along. > > Am I the only one who can see this? Please tell me how I'm wrong. > > > > > Jojo > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > *To:* akira shirakawa <[email protected]> ; Arik El Boher > <[email protected]> ; Brian Ahern <[email protected]> ; CMNS > <[email protected]> ; Dagmar Kuhn <[email protected]> ; doug marker > <[email protected]> ; Dr. Braun Tibor <[email protected]> ; eCatNews > <[email protected]> ; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian <[email protected]> ; Gary > <[email protected]> ; Haiko Lietz <[email protected]> ; jeff aries > <[email protected]> ; Lewan Mats <[email protected]> ; Nicolaie N. > Vlad <[email protected]> ; Peter Mobberley > <[email protected]> ; Pierre Clauzon <[email protected]> > ; Roberto Germano <[email protected]> ; Roy Virgilio > <[email protected]> ; Steven Krivit <[email protected]> ; Sunwon > Park <[email protected]> ; Tsirlin, Mark <[email protected]> ; vlad > <[email protected]> ; VORTEX <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 9:58 PM > *Subject:* [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL > > Dear Friends > I have just published: > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/fundamental-causation-mechanisms-of-lenr.html > > It would be very risky saying that AXIL is an open-minded and > anti-dogmatic physicist (he really is!) because - I tell it from > experience- all physicists claim(ed) to be so- even our late arch-enemy > John Huizenga (RIP!) > > However, AXIL represents the New Wave in LENR physics and > it is increasingly obvious (for me) that only a New Tsunami would be able > to remove the obstacles in the way of a realistic and useful LENR > complex of theories. > > Peter > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
