Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore.  If you 
are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem.  I am sick 
of your bullying and attitude as if you are the boss here.  GROW UP.


Jojo


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kevin O'Malley 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL


  But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the one 
guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this subject 
any longer.  Well, other than the fact that he hasn't kept his word, it would 
be a good plan to have the discussion on this thread.




  On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:07 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:

    The Biblical stuff has other venues.



    On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High <[email protected]> 
wrote:

      Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating 
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout 
posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting 
ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned 
folk at vortex, but that seems to be getting crowded out by the discussion on 
radiometrics and religion. I would like to read that too, just on a different 
thread. The crux of Axil's idea seems to be that nanomagnetic excitation of the 
nucleus results in the production of virtual mesons that turn into muons that 
go on to promote  proton-proton interactions. I am wondering if these 
individual steps have received scientific exposition or validation elsewhere, 
and can all this take place without having to deal with the dreaded gamma ray?



      On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> 
wrote:

        We are talking rational history here, right?  


        Google hits for 

        "historicity of Bhagavad Gita"  :  3


        "historicity of Jesus"  :  about 214,000


        Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad 
Gita, "do you really believe these are historical accounts"?  Their answer is 
basically no, it's just something they believe in.  They were raised believing 
it, so they don't rock that boat.  







        On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> 
wrote:

          Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in 
his previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna. 


          It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. 
Or do you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching?




          2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>:


            I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult.

            As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to 
me.  Are these passages from the Mahabharata?



            Jojo






          -- 
          Daniel Rocha - RJ
          [email protected]







Reply via email to