On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Life is too short and I have other things more important than dealing with > your "chip on your shoulder" childish attitude. The record shows that you > have insulted and have been childish to many people here before I showed > up. Here are just a sample of people you picked fights with. > > 1. Peter Gluck > ***What does SWOT mean? He chose to engage in trading page after page of insults rather than just define it. Jed agreed that it should have been spelled out. > 2. Lennart Thornros > ***Fun set of insults on a guy who is a strategic follower claiming to be a "strategic leader". How is it inappropriate to point that crap out? > 3. Mark at Zeropoint > ***Not high on my remember-o-meter. > 4. Blaze Spinnaker > ***The guy came onto this forum explicitly to fleece "true believers" and even admitted it. As a christian you should have a problem with it. I did. Go ahead and start from scratch with that guy and point out where my insults were inappropriate. > 5. Dave Roberson > ***Again not high on my remember-o-meter. 6. Me. > ***I started insulting you AFTER you pointed out that I had insulted others. When did I insult you BEFORE that? And you strategically forget that I insulted AXIL,whom you want to boot off this forum. And I insulted ED Storms, who didn't seem to know that Hsu won a Nobel Prize for laser cooling. > > > Should I go on? > ***Yes, but you have given your commitment not to respond to me on this thread. So every time you do so, you break your word. How important is that to you? > > You can hve the last insult my friend, Have at it. > ***Thanks for letting me have the last word. I doubt you will honor your commitment. > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:34 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL > > > > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore. >> If you are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem. >> > ***bullshit. Your point number 5 had nothing to do with "religious > stuff". And you've continued to comment on religious stuff. And you've > continued to respond to me, after you said you wouldn't. > > Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> > Aug 15 (1 day ago) > > > to vortex-l > > JOJO: > This will be my last response on this subject lest I get too hyped up and > bring the quick judgement of the mob here again. But let me just point out > a few things. > ........ > 5. I don't understand Axil's audacity to challenge Ed and come away > claiming that he is more right than Ed. I'll take Ed's worst speculation > over Axil's best everytime. > > ***You ain't true to your word. Your last set of speculations has the > audacity to "challenge Ed", and you are a hypocrite to boot. You deserve > to be keyed up on. I would not characterize it as bullying. I would > characterize your crappy attitude towards Axil and trying to remove him > from this discussion group as bullying, "as if you are the boss here. Grow > Up". Why should anyone listen to you? > > > > > > > > >> I am sick of your bullying and attitude as if you are the boss here. >> GROW UP. >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:11 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL >> >> But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the >> one guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this >> subject any longer. Well, other than the fact that he hasn't kept his >> word, it would be a good plan to have the discussion on this thread. >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:07 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The Biblical stuff has other venues. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating >>>> could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout >>>> posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting >>>> ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned >>>> folk at vortex, but that seems to be getting crowded out by the discussion >>>> on radiometrics and religion. I would like to read that too, just on a >>>> different thread. The crux of Axil's idea seems to be that nanomagnetic >>>> excitation of the nucleus results in the production of virtual mesons that >>>> turn into muons that go on to promote proton-proton interactions. I am >>>> wondering if these individual steps have received scientific exposition or >>>> validation elsewhere, and can all this take place without having to deal >>>> with the dreaded gamma ray? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We are talking rational history here, right? >>>>> >>>>> Google hits for >>>>> "historicity of Bhagavad Gita" : 3 >>>>> >>>>> "historicity of Jesus" : about 214,000 >>>>> >>>>> Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad >>>>> Gita, "do you really believe these are historical accounts"? Their answer >>>>> is basically no, it's just something they believe in. They were raised >>>>> believing it, so they don't rock that boat. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in >>>>>> his previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. >>>>>> Or do you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to >>>>>>> me. Are these passages from the Mahabharata? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jojo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
