On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore.
> If you are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem.
>
***bullshit.  Your point number 5 had nothing to do with "religious
stuff".  And you've continued to comment on religious stuff.  And you've
continued to respond to me, after you said you wouldn't.

Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>
Aug 15 (1 day ago)


to vortex-l

JOJO:
This will be my last response on this subject lest I get too hyped up and
bring the quick judgement of the mob here again.  But let me just point out
a few things.
 ........
5. I don't understand Axil's audacity to challenge Ed and come away
claiming that he is more right than Ed.  I'll take Ed's worst speculation
over Axil's best everytime.

***You ain't true to your word.  Your last set of speculations has the
audacity to "challenge Ed", and you are a hypocrite to boot.  You deserve
to be keyed up on.  I would not characterize it as bullying.  I would
characterize your crappy attitude towards Axil and trying to remove him
from this discussion group as bullying, "as if you are the boss here.  Grow
Up".  Why should anyone listen to you?








> I am sick of your bullying and attitude as if you are the boss here.  GROW
> UP.
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>
> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:11 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
>
> But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the one
> guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this
> subject any longer.  Well, other than the fact that he hasn't kept his
> word, it would be a good plan to have the discussion on this thread.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:07 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The Biblical stuff has other venues.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
>>> could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
>>> posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting
>>> ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned
>>> folk at vortex, but that seems to be getting crowded out by the discussion
>>> on radiometrics and religion. I would like to read that too, just on a
>>> different thread. The crux of Axil's idea seems to be that nanomagnetic
>>> excitation of the nucleus results in the production of virtual mesons that
>>> turn into muons that go on to promote  proton-proton interactions. I am
>>> wondering if these individual steps have received scientific exposition or
>>> validation elsewhere, and can all this take place without having to deal
>>> with the dreaded gamma ray?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   We are talking rational history here, right?
>>>>
>>>> Google hits for
>>>> "historicity of Bhagavad Gita"  :  3
>>>>
>>>> "historicity of Jesus"  :  about 214,000
>>>>
>>>> Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad
>>>> Gita, "do you really believe these are historical accounts"?  Their answer
>>>> is basically no, it's just something they believe in.  They were raised
>>>> believing it, so they don't rock that boat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in
>>>>> his previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. Or
>>>>> do you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to me.
>>>>>> Are these passages from the Mahabharata?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jojo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to