The easiest way to reconcile the latest Va’vra paper (and the 511 keV line which comes from the center of the Milky Way galaxy) with the predicted Naudts x-ray spectral value for DDL can be rather simple (hopefully not naïve).
The DDL reaches a plateau of electron orbital stability at 3.7 keV. Dark
matter accumulates having this bond strength. There is no lower plateau for
a stable orbital. The rapidly alternating magnetic field of the DDL is
indistinguishable from a monopole. (in fact, a monopole is most easily
defined as rapidly alternating polar magnetism where only a intense but
nonpolar field is felt). The characteristic interaction of monopoles with
each other is strong mutual attraction up to a fairly substantial distance
(cm range perhaps) and then strong mutual repulsion thereafter, prohibiting
any dense aggregation of DDL, but yet large diffuse clouds of dark matter
having substantial net mass are possible. The DDL are only subject to
attraction from the extreme gravitomagnetic field of a dense object like a
black hole.
The emission line which is seen in the center of our galaxy is related to
the total disappearance of electrons from an adjacent cloud of dark matter
into a black hole, and not to DDL formation ab initio. The dark matter had
been there for a very long time in DDL form.
_____________________________________________
This latest Va’vra paper could be an extremely important
stimulus for and evolving LENR version of the DDL. It is chock full of
detail that bears reading and rereading.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.0833v3.pdf
Although the DDL transition is at 511 keV is the focus this
paper, which is ostensibly ruled out for LENR (looked for and not found) …
the discussion of the lower x-ray ranges from 2.5-4 keV are still in play,
although it is not certain how they would be evidenced in a working reactor.
In short, the DDL of Naudts at 3.7 keV is definitely still a player for an
emerging theory, as mentioned in this paper.
Given the similarity of this higher 511 keV value to
positron annihilation, it would be interesting to try to fit this into Don
Hotson’s theory. Too bad Don is not around to do that but others may take up
the cause. It almost seems possible that some of what passes for Wheeler’s
“quantum foam” in not virtual positronium, per se, but DDL hydrogen.
From: Bob Higgins
* I did some additional research to find Dr. Va'vra. I found his email
and asked him about the latter 3 papers. Here was his interesting response:
However, there is a problem with all these
types of calculations. They use a 1920-1930 quantum mechanics. The correct
treatment must use QED. There were attempts to do that, and I mention that
in my more recent ArXiv paper: 1304.0833v3.
Mills used fractional quantum numbers. That
is a "no no" for the classical quantum mechanics. So, I consider his method
wrong.
Regards, Jerry
* Dr. Va'vra has a 2013 ArXiv paper
(http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.0833v3.pdf) - I think it is a fascinating fit to
this thread. If someone else already cited this, I apologize for the
duplication.
Bob Higgins
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
