If you put your name on a paper and present it at a conference before your piers making such are extraordinary claim, would you not verify the data?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:45 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > wrote: > > I personally think that the field is the net vector sum of a very large >> number of tiny sources and hence may not become as large as is suggested as >> we close in on those individual sources. >> > > If we accept at face value Kim's repeating of DGT's claim of 0.6 - 1.6 > Tesla (in this regard I suspect he's simply taking DGT's data on faith, as > a good-natured theorist), I would also assume that it is the result of a > vector sum of a large number of small magnetic moments. > > Eric > >
