Interesting argument that I had not seen before. And it starts with life being present at the beginning, whereas the earliest life postulated by abiogenesis proponents is about 5 Billion years ago. That makes it a very conservative theory. Working backwards, we should see the kind of change you postulate once every 2 days, not 6 days.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Assuming the most liberal assumptions of the age of the Universe being > 16,000,000,000 years. (504576000000000000 seconds) > > Assuming that at the birth of the Universe there was a single cell > lifeform. > > Assuming that there are 1,000,000,000,000 changes from a single cell > lifeform vs Man. (There is certainly more than 1 trillion differences > between man and single cell lifeform.) > > This single lifeform must produce a change every 140 hours or 5.84 > days (504576000000000000/1000000000000) for it to evolve into Man. > > This is absolutely ridiculous. Evolution rates this fast must surely be > observable. Where are the observable changes we can see? > > Simple math like this clearly prove that Darwinian Evolution is stupid, > yet we have intelligent people like Jed arguing for it. I truly wonder why > that is the case. > > > > > Jojo > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:51 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Evolutionists As Idiots > > Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > To Jed and the rest of Darwinian Evolutionists here: >> >> I have a simple question: >> >> 1. What is your best evidence of Darwinian Evolution occuring? >> > > There are thousands of books full of irrefutable proof that Darwinian > evolution is occurring. For you, or anyone else, to question it is exactly > like questioning Newton's law of gravity, or the fact that bacteria causes > disease. > > I am not going to debate this. Anyone who denies basic science on this > level is grossly ignorant. These nonsensical distinctions between macro- > and micro-level evolution have no basis in fact. They are the product of > religious creationism, which is sacrilegious nonsense, since it posits God > as a cosmic deceiver who filled every nook and cranny of life with proof of > evolution just as a trick to fool us. > > If you want to learn about evolution and biology, read a textbook. Don't > annoy people who know the subject. > > I will not try to spoon-feed you facts about nature that you should have > learned in 3rd grade. Anyone who makes the kind of ridiculous assertions > about evolution that you make is beyond my help. I spent far too much time > trying to educate people about cold fusion. When people have no idea of how > the laws of thermodynamics operate, or the difference between power and > energy, there is no chance they can understand cold fusion. It is a waste > of time trying to explain it. I have uploaded papers on cold fusion, > including some guides for beginners. Other people have uploaded beginner's > guides to evolution. Learn from them, or wallow in ignorance. Your choice. > As Arthur Clarke used to say: over and out! > > - Jed > >
