On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote:
> OK Kevin I understand you can read but you do not understand full > sentences. > ***OK Lennart I realize you have a tremendous need to start out your posts with zinger insults, but don't really have the intelligence to generate worthwhile ones. > I do not want to eliminate anyone. > ***Of course you do. You're just not honest about it. > I do not want to discuss religion with you or others at Vortex. > ***Then don't. Just ignore it. Trying to censor it off Vortex is among many of your "strategic followership" mistakes. > I am not going to take your advice as I am already old enough to have an > established opinion. > ***And I'm old enough to have mine. Of course, mine is more open minded than yours. And it represents true "strategic leadership" rather than the PC pablum you push. > > > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com > lenn...@thornros.com > +1 916 436 1899 > 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 > > “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a > commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Lennart: >> >> Trying to weed out religion would whittle down Vortex to about 3 >> members. Because secular humanism is a religion. Atheism is a religion. >> Scientism is a religion. Heck, one of my favorite cold fusioneers sued the >> US Patent Office because he "believed in" cold fusion, like as in a >> religion. >> >> http://etheric.com/LaViolette/EEOC.html >> >> Best of luck with all 3 of those vorts who have zero religion. >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Kevin, don't think to hard, it just makes tired. Your response is not >>> worth the paper it is written on (Not). >>> I am not talking about any religion. I am not telling you how it is. I >>> am not asking you to verify my opinion. The reason are several: >>> 1. You are not qualified. >>> 2. If I wanted to talk religion I would join a religious vortex group >>> and there I would say that having a discussion about LENR would be >>> worthless. (They probably are less knowledgeable about LENR than I am. >>> At least have a big flag so I just can delete messages with zero value - >>> in my opinion. >>> Your way of debating is so poor that the only one identifying himself is >>> you. >>> You have no idea about my preferences in any regard so your attempt to >>> insult are not even hitting in the right county. >>> >>> Best Regards , >>> Lennart Thornros >>> >>> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >>> lenn...@thornros.com >>> +1 916 436 1899 >>> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 >>> >>> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >>> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >>> >>>> At 07:55 PM 8/29/2014, Jojo Iznart wrote: >>>> >>>>  >>>> The answer to this question is 100 million. >>>> >>>> >>>> That was a very good answer (based on the available sources.) >>>> >>> >>> >> >
