I wrote: Yes -- I have no reason to disagree with this. I was addressing > specifically the multiples of 2 D and 3 D that some believe have been > identified in transmutations (i.e., Z=+4, Z=+6, Z=+8, but not Z=+2.). >
Sorry -- that's supposed to be "M" (for mass number) rather than "Z" (for proton number). I.e., 2, 3 or 4 deuterons captured, but not a single one. Eric
