What is missing from LENR theory is how any nuclear radiation types are not detected in the Rossi reaction. I have put forward the Super-absorber theory made possible by boson condensation. The testing and analysis group are afraid to put their names onto a nuclear reaction mechanism that is nuclear radiation free.
Yes, these testers are hopelessly conflicted. They state that the reaction must be nuclear because of the large amounts of energy produced, but say that nuclear reactions cannot occur without the detection of nuclear radiation. They cannot believe the evidence of their own eyes. They are afraid to stake their reputations on proclaiming the obvious conclusions of this test On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > One more interesting thing about this report. If lithium is the active > fuel, and not hydrogen, which seems to be the case, then the ash which is > lithium-6 is as valuable for batteries as is the natural metal. Maybe more > valuable. > > Thus the fuel is essentially free, since the ash can be sold for cost (or > even marked-up). > > Not that cost is as big an issue for IH as it is for Tesla, but it could > also be that Li-6 is safer. "Safer" is worth paying for. > > Remember the Boeing lithium fires on their new plane? > > They were NEVER able to locate the real problem. Perhaps it was lithium-7 > and the problem will go away once they get an adequate supply of Li-6 to > make batteries only from the lighter isotope ... which of course will be > the ash of the Rossi/IH reactor and the others which follow. > > I could see the necessity of Safety Laws being necessary, sometime in the > future to demand that only Li-6 be used in batteries. > > Why do I think Elon Musk is already onto this ? > > Jones > > > >
