Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> You, Ahern, and the other skeptics have not addressed the reasons why a > large mistake with the IR camera is unlikely. So I assume you have no > rebuttal. Until you do respond I will assume the issue is settled and there > is no problem. > > > > Are you blind – or you are not listening? There is a massive problem. > No, there isn't. If there were a massive problem, it would show up as bogus high temperatures in the incandescent portions of the reactor. The actual temperature would be around 750 deg C (based on the calibration). The incandescent portions would show up as much more than 1400 deg C. Anyone can see that is impossible. The other reason we know there is no problem is described in the thread here, "lumina transmissivity." Ahern has not address this either, even though I sent him copies, twice. > Ahern is an expert with pyrometry and high temperature measurement. > In that case he should address these issues. Until he does, I consider the matter closed. It is unfounded blather like the concerns about about wet steam were. Levi eliminated them by turning up the flow rate. (At least, that is what he told Lewan and me. Perhaps he is part of the conspiracy, in which case none of this is true.) The same goes for you. You should address the technical issues and stop yelling about imaginary, physically impossible fraud conducted by ESP from another continent. > Please – NEVER suggest again that this issue is settled unless you mean it > is settled that Rossi has been caught in the act of deceiving the good > folks at Elforsk, IH and elsewhere. > The good folks at Elforsk know much more about IR cameras, heat and energy than Rossi does, or than you do. This is a power company research consortium, like EPRI. In any case, Rossi had no say in the design of this experiment or the choice of instruments. - Jed
