Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote:

> As for the motivations of the report, that's an interesting point.   I
> always assumed he needs it to get a patent and if the patent agents don't
> see the report as being really TIP, than they may come to the same
> conclusions I have here, that is is involvement was very bizarre..
>

This one report will not be enough to get a patent. That would take several
follow-up reports. I think this is good enough for Elforsk and others to
fund additional tests. That's how I read Elforsk's response. This is a step
along the way to a patent.

You cannot expect one test to produce be-all, end-all proof. That does not
happen outside of a Hollywood movie such as "The Saint" (which was about
cold fusion!)

I do not see anything bizarre about his involvement, because I do not think
it is possible for someone thousands of kilometers away to affect power
meters and IR cameras, so I am not worried about fraud. As I said, there is
no reason for Rossi or anyone else to commit fraud with the ash. The mass
spec findings in this report have not helped to convince anyone. If
anything, they cause more disbelief.

- Jed

Reply via email to