If you look at the paper I have published on my blog yesterday, the isotope results not more so improbable. Li-Ni nuclear interactions can explain some isitopes. The bad side is that the analysis is not complete waht happens to Fe and Ak for example and what light elements are nucleosynthesized? No dat. Peter
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Jed Rothwell . > > > > Ø So, are you going to retract your previous assertions about how Rossi > cheated on the calorimetry, magically affecting it from thousands of > kilometers away? > > > > I made it clear that the cheating was in the isotope analysis, and that is > even more clear now than before. > > > > Ø And about how Rossi is playing me like a harp? Or should we just > forget you said anything like that? > > > > He faked the isotope analysis and he is still playing you like a harp. > > Ø > > Ø You should maybe think consider -- oh, I don't know -- apologizing for > your damned unfounded obnoxious insults to me and others. Just a thought. > > > > You are a fine one to complain about throwing out insults. Just a thought. > > Ø > > Ø Brian’s suspicions are as strong as ever about the isotope analysis, > maybe more so. The reality of excess heat make that deception even more > important to understand. > > > > Ø When are you going to learn not to make rash, unfounded accusations? > > > > This is neither rash nor unfounded. Rossi has cheated on the isotopes. > There is no doubt in my mind. > > Ø > > Ø You do not have a scrap of evidence that deception occurred. > > > > And you know this, how? > > > > Ø Furthermore, as I pointed out here, there is no motive for Rossi or > anyone else in this project to put fake ash into the reactor. > > > > Of course there is financial motive. You have pointed out your own > ignorance of the situation. Have you seen his agreement? Since you have > not, then stuff a sock in you silly homily about no motive. There is motive. > > > > Ø f they did this, it is certain they will be caught in the next phase. > Absolutely, unquestionably certain. > > > > Yes we agree on that. He will be caught. > > > > Ø It is possible the mass spectroscopy is in error. It might even be > contamination. But it is not credible and hardly possible it was > deliberately introduced by anyone because there is no motive to do that. > > > > What? You can’t be serious. No- it is not contamination. And yes, he > deliberately introduced the pure isotopes, and yes he does have financial > motive to do this and yes, he will be caught. > > > > The harp music is kind of shrill, can you retune your instrument? > > > > Jones > > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
