Does this not indicate that the wire must be producing inductive heating in the powder?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Robert Lynn <[email protected] > wrote: > the resistor wire expands with respect to the alumina as it heats up, > breaking any bonding contact, or lifting the wire of the inner alumina tube > in more and more places and leading to less and less conductive contact - > prompting the wire to heat up as more as more of the energy it transmits to > the reactor must be via radiation and conduction through gas rather than > contact-conduction. This is the likely what makes it appear that there is > a gain above 1. > > On 16 October 2014 01:13, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> New version with embedded wires. >> >> http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_hotcat_oct2014_141014b.php >> >> Here I've also assumed that the wires are a simple single strand, rather >> than the spiral form used in the earlier tests, and are in good thermal >> contact with the Alumina. >> >> >
