-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook 

> Was there any indication that the Mizuno experiments used quadrupole 
electric or magnetic inputs? I was not aware of this, if it happened.

This is an interesting point, and the Mizuno experiment may not have been 
optimized. Hopefully the next iteration will tell us more. One interesting 
thing about superparamagnetism is that a quadrupole is a natural outgrowth of 
any changing field, and if the deuterium becomes superparamagnetic that is all 
we need.

> Also keep in mind that D is a Bose particle (as is 4HE) and can form a BEC 
or a duplex BEC with two different Bose particles. This may be a reality in 
a strong magnetic field, temperature be damned.

Deuterium in normally diamagnetic as a molecule and we really do not need for 
it to a BEC to see excess energy. As a bare nucleus, it may be 
superparamagnetic, and that could be enough for spin coupling.

Superparamagnetism in somewhat "new" to consideration in the LENR field, since 
it is an outgrowth of nanotechnology. We have much to learn about spin-coupling 
but in my mind, superparamagnetism will be a major piece of the puzzle, but 
certainly bosons which are superparamagnetic are more likely to participate in 
energy transfers than fermions.

> The question I have is how a BEC can shed energy and change the mass of its 
constituents without disrupting the condensate. 

Well - Deuterium cannot even become a condensate in normal LENR, since it 
requires cryogenic temperatures. However, there are boson condensates in SPP 
which form at elevated temperature but they are not massive. Axil and myself 
have presented scholarly articles to that effect. An answer for original 
question is that an SPP condensate allows energy to be coupled from A to B 
(where A is a boson like the deuteron) without itself necessarily participating 
in the reaction.

> Maybe it is a series of condensation and disruption that controls the 
> reaction. The dynamics of this process would be key to controlling the rate 
> of the process.

Still not sure why you think that deuterium can become a BEC above a few 
degrees of absolute zero? Is there any evidence for this?

Jones

----- Original Message ----- 
Bob,

I have cherry-picked three major “spin facts” from this compendium which
indicate that if one wants to apply a nano-magnetism or spin-coupling
modality to LENR, it is highly preferable to use deuterium, as opposed to
hydrogen. That may be why Mizuno chose the deuterium-nickel combination. All
eyes will be shifting to Mizuno in less than three weeks.

From: Bob Cook
[snip] The deuteron, being an isospin singlet, is antisymmetric under
nucleon exchange due to isospin, and therefore must be symmetric under the
double exchange of their spin and location. Therefore it can be in either of
the following two different states: Symmetric spin and symmetric under
parity. In this case, the exchange of the two nucleons will multiply the
deuterium wavefunction by (-1) from isospin exchange, (+1) from spin
exchange and (+1) from parity (location exchange), for a total of (-1) as
needed for antisymmetry…. In this case, the exchange of the two nucleons
will multiply the deuterium wavefunction by (-1) from isospin exchange, (-1)
from spin exchange and (-1) from parity (location exchange), again for a
total of (-1) as needed for antisymmetry. [snip]

…suggesting that there may be a way to stimulate the D via an electric
quadrupole input signal.   Also with a magnetic moment the D must respond to
a magnetic field and fine tuning of an oscillating magnetic field may very
well excite the D to flip up and down in the field.  The composite particles
of the D should have slightly different magnetic moments that can respond
and create an "excited" state IMHO on a transient short lived time frame.
However in a coherent system such a transient may be enough to cause other
transitions of similar energy states to occur with mass energy being changed
to angular momentum energy.

The quadrupole input is a strong clue.



Reply via email to