The note from Kur is seriously in error.  Dr. McKubre was entirely correct in 
his assumptions about the constant current operation of his cells.  As he 
explained, the AC noise voltage variations average out over the long term and 
do not contribute to the net input power calculations and hence energy.   The 
skeptics should listen more, study theory in detail, and speculate less.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>
To: Vortex List <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Oct 27, 2014 2:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component





2014-10-24 23:14 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>:

McKubre never reported a 3% gain. Even with his calorimeter that would be in 
the margin of error at the bottom of the scale, although he can detect the 
difference between, say, 40% and 43%. As I recall, McKubre reported gains 
ranging from 20% to 300% with input power, and infinity without input power, in 
heat after death. He once remarked that for the entire run, the gain was ~3%. I 
wish he had not said that. It is a meaningless number. It is like reporting the 
average speed of your car including the times it is parked, or waiting at a red 
light. The only meaningful number for "gain" or "COP" is when excess heat is 
clearly present.


The effect of bubbles in electrochemical cells is well understood and it has 
been easy to observe at least since oscilloscopes were invented. It cannot 
possibly produce an error on this scale. Not even 1%. People who speculate 
about such things have read nothing and know nothing.


This notion is somewhat similar to the claim that cells might be "storing" 
chemical energy and releasing it. Ignorant skeptics come up with this several 
times a year. You need only glance at the data to establish that: 1. Nothing is 
being stored; there are no endothermic phases, and 2. Continuous, uninterrupted 
bursts of heat far exceed the limits of chemistry. A calorimeter can detect an 
endothermic reaction as well as it can detect an exothermic reaction. If this 
was chemical storage, the endothermic phases would show up as clearly as the 
exothermic phases that follow them, and the two would balance. This is exactly 
what you see for the small amount of energy that is stored and release by 
palladium hydrides.


I relayed you answer on the dozen of similar post


note that Kur propose a more synthetic article
https://sites.google.com/site/barrykort/ac-burst-noise






Reply via email to