On 07.09.2005 04:42, Reed Hedges wrote:
> Right, sorry, when I say Unicode, I mean something we choose (one) that
> is the most-inclusive of all character sets/languages.  Such an
> all-inclusive encoding would likely be a multibyte encoding, I presume.

Yeah... IIRC you have up to 2^21 characters in Unicode, that not
everything fits into a byte is obvious ;) Which UTF you pick in the end
does not really matter - all of them enclose Unicode completely.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

vos-d mailing list

Reply via email to