Not to rain on the parade but markup transliteration of objects has been done before. See US Navy MID design prototypes. If you use that analogy be sure to clarify that this is not a simple transliteration. Using a syntax designed for documents to create a programming language turned out to be a not very good idea. MID I eventually became the predecessor to XAML and XUL by about ten years.
len From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Amstutz > It's an OK analogy but only if you don't then start applying assumptions > to VOS based on what XML is for and what it's restrictions are. Right. I'd only use this analogy with someone who already has a vague idea that VOS is about communicating objects and not documents. _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
