Lalo Martins wrote: > AIUI from IRC conversations, the site IDs won't actually be visible to > the application programmer later on; we'll deal only with IDs like "/vos/ > core/StringProperty". (I'm not sure about the code namespaces, but I > hope some simplification is intended there too ;-) ) Peter has actually > told me a few days ago that side IDs being required for the type > attribute in XOD is "a bug". For now, we cope; the IDs are extra work, > but not really a killer.
Aha, that's nicer then, and sounds similar to how I was hoping it would work (with the name (e.g. "StringProperty") as the actual name used by humans). I will miss the foo:bar type syntax, but that's OK I guess if in the new syntax things are equally expressive but terse. Curious what the "bug" is; what's missing from s5 that will fix this? (Curious so I can understand S5 a bit more.) > All C++ files except for main.cc (and in my branch, plugin.cc) are > generated. Here's how I observed it works: Thanks! Does one just run voscodegen with the xod file as input to generate the code? Reed _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
