So, you started with cubic box of 95A * 3  (gromacs units are nm)? Then you T 
annealed, got output confout.gro (with box size at the bottom of the file), 
change of the box size can be taken from trajectory.

I am not too sure about your method, tbh, as annealing is a funny thing - it 
can cause system to lag behind. Personally, I wouldn't use a system that 
potentially can not have reached equilibrium to get reference potentials for CG.

.tpr is binary, i.e. you cannot read it.

csg_stat - I am not sure, better ask developers, but I would expect it to come 
from the trajectory.

V



On 13 Aug 2013, at 10:56, [email protected] wrote:

> Sorry, my cell dimension was 95A (I was running temperature annealing so the 
> box dimension changed). Where in tpr file can I see the actual cell 
> dimension? I mean from where csg_stat takes the cell dimension to calculate 
> RDFs?
> 
> Steven
> 
> W dniu wtorek, 13 sierpnia 2013 10:49:13 UTC+1 użytkownik Valentina Erastova 
> napisał:
> Hi,
> 
> I am a little confused there.
> 
> You need to have a well equilibrated system before you CG. My way is to run 
> NPT, but make sure that the system is equilibrated and V is also constant.
> 
> When you start CG, I would use NVT, check what is the P (normally completely 
> off), then do a P-correction.
> 
> Good luck, V
> 
> 
> On 13 Aug 2013, at 10:37, <[email protected]>
>  wrote:
> 
>> I think I know where is the reason... I set the wrong unit cell in my CG 
>> model. However, I run full atomistic in NPT and the cubic unit cell was 
>> changing between 94A and 114A. Which shall I set up in my CG run then which 
>> is in NVT? 
>> 
>> W dniu poniedziałek, 12 sierpnia 2013 17:02:36 UTC+1 użytkownik Valentina 
>> Erastova napisał:
>> Hi, have you used scaling by by 1 /4 \pi r^2for bond  and  by 1/ sin 
>> (\theta) for angle distribution?
>> 
>> I assume those are angles & bonds.
>> 
>> Best,
>> V
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12 Aug 2013, at 16:39, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Users,
>>> 
>>> I run 7500 iterations of the protein with 5 different bead types so 15 
>>> distributions. Please, see attached 4 examples - black atomistic, red 
>>> coarse-grained.
>>> 14 of them have exactly the same shapes as atomistic but have higher values 
>>> and they stopped converging after 6000 steps. Only one (attached) perfectly 
>>> converged.
>>> May that be the reason of the one converged so its a wrong distribution so 
>>> the other cannot? Or everything is ok and I just to normalize them?
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Steven
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "votca" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>>> <Dsitributions_RDF.png>
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "votca" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to