On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:41 AM changseo park <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> OK, the more RDF and averaging them will not help.
>
> About my system, PNIPAM in water, I'm working on CG parameterization for 280K 
> state which is Coil state based on All atom results( LOPLS + TIP4P/2005)
>
> I confirmed that the all atom scale PNIPAM has extended structure at 280K and 
> collapsed structure at 320K statistically (300ns trajectory and check the 
> histogram of Rg).
>
> And I need the CG parameter only below the LCST(280K).
>
>
> For non bonded parameter, can I converge the non-bonded parameter one by one??
>
> In my system there are 3 bead and total 6 non bonded interaction.
>
> As trial, I tested only A-A non bonded interaction for IBI and I could get 
> the potential fully describe the A-A rdf while the IBI for total 6 non bonded 
> convergence I couldn't. Can I use this as AA non bonded potential??
>
> I think the potential AA BB CC AB BC AC should be independent? Correct?
>
> Although AB BC AC is dependent on AA BB CC, I think AA BB CC potential should 
> be independent
>
> actually, I saw the query that the nonbonded interaction is dependent, but 
> there was no exact explanation
>
> Plz attach reference or explain precisely about the reason.
All your questions are very system specific and not really related to
VOTCA itself, so sorry I am not the expert for PNIPAM nor am I a
personal tutor, you will have to figure these answers out by yourself.
If you need more information about coarse-graining of PNIPAM I would
advise you to contact the authors of  J. Phys. Chem. B 2018,  122,
1516−1524.

Christoph
>
> Always thanks to answer my question.
>
>
>
> 2018년 10월 17일 수요일 오전 2시 4분 35초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:57 AM changseo park <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > After getting sum advice and searching several queries, I did IBI for 
>> > non-bonded, but still I couldn't get the converged non bonded potential
>> >
>> > My system composed of one 30m PNIPAM chain in dilute water. the polymer 
>> > chain composed of 3 bead per monomer so total 90 beads.
>> >
>> > Since the PNIPAM has hydrophilic and hydrophobic part, the conformation of 
>> > polymer chain is changing, extended to collapsed. So the rdf has broad and 
>> > insignificant peak.
>> >
>> > I got the rdf from NPT 300ns atomistic simulation as target and the IBI 
>> > process continues in NVT with sd for 10ns per iteration.
>> >
>> > I used post update option smooth (with iteration 3) and scale (0.1) and I 
>> > also used do_potential options
>> >
>> > for bonded potential, I used the results of Boltzmann inversion potential.
>> >
>> > the attached file shows the target and new rdf for the system at step_11 
>> > and step_30
>> >
>> > I'm following the method almost same as this paper with different materials
>> > <J. Phys. Chem. B 2018,  122, 1516−1524>
>> >
>> > the convergence of nonbonded interaction is quite good for this system, 
>> > single PAM in water.
>> >
>> > The cause for divergence is, I guess, the quality of RDF.
>> >
>> > I wonder the convergence problem could be solved with better RDF, by doing 
>> > another 5set of atomistic simulation with 300ns and getting the rdf from 
>> > average value
>>
>> I don't think that will help, coarse-graining for a system with
>> different phases, like PNIPAM with open and collapsed, is just hard.
>> You might need to develop different coarse-grained potential for each
>> phase.
>>
>> Christoph
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018년 10월 6일 토요일 오전 1시 39분 53초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 7:11 AM changseo park <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for quick answer!!
>> >> >
>> >> > Okay, the main criteria for convergence is to compare the distribution 
>> >> > function one by one with target function
>> >> >
>> >> > In my case, the Convergence sum is start from 15000 and after step 2, 
>> >> > it varies from 3000~5000 in every step until more than 300 step
>> >> >
>> >> > when I compared the distribution function, the votca fits the specific 
>> >> > peak on the target and switch the specific peaks to others again and 
>> >> > again.  is it normal process for votca?
>> >>
>> >> I am not 100% sure what you mean but it sounds to me like the IBI is
>> >> overshooting, so you should try to scale the update with the postupd
>> >> scale option.
>> >> >
>> >> > and, The peak location is similar but the y-value has absolute 
>> >> > difference comparing to the target, is it OK??
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > In addtion, I wonder the votca has the potential fixed options which 
>> >> > means that,
>> >> >
>> >> > Q. If the A-A rdf shows good convergence comparing to the target 
>> >> > distribution, then can I fix the A-A non bonded CG parameter and 
>> >> > continue the iteration for other non bonded interaction? (A-B, A-C 
>> >> > ...etc)??
>> >> There is no automatic way to do that.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Since the iteration could be faster when we start from simple 
>> >> > parameterization to complicated parameterization, is there any tips or 
>> >> > advice for non bonded IBI instead of iteration for 6 nonbonded 
>> >> > parameter at the same time.
>> >> > (for example, <do_potential> options etc....>
>> >> Yeah, you can update one potential per iteration step, using
>> >> do_potential "1 0 0 0 0 0" for the 1st potential and "0 1 0 0 0 0" for
>> >> the 2nd potential and so on.
>> >>
>> >> Christoph
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyway, I really thank to develop votca^^
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2018년 10월 5일 금요일 오후 9시 17분 24초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 6:12 AM changseo park <[email protected]> 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > TO. VOTCA users
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi, I'm new user for VOTCA.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm researching about one single chain polymer conformation change 
>> >> >> > in water dilute system.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I figured out all the errors based on queries on VOTCA and I started 
>> >> >> > the IBI step.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > For get CG non bonded parameter, I got the bonded interaction from 
>> >> >> > the csg_boltzmann and converted to the table form.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > There is no problem to do iteration for non-bonded interaction
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > However, the convergence sum is quite big for iteration.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > My convergence criteria is 0.5, but the usual convergence sum is 
>> >> >> > about 2000~3000.
>> >> >> The convergence value depends on a lot of things, e.g. # of
>> >> >> interactions, normalization etc., I would put too much belief in that
>> >> >> one number, just look at the RDFs in comparison to the targets and see
>> >> >> if they have converged.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Christoph
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The attached files is about IBI for 6 RDF, non bonded interaction 
>> >> >> > (AA, AB, AC, BC, BB, CC)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Plz give me advice to converge non bonded interaction
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks in advance
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> >> > Groups "votca" group.
>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> >> >> > send an email to [email protected].
>> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> > Groups "votca" group.
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> >> > an email to [email protected].
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to