On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM changseo park <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I did IBI for non bond interaction on PNIPAM chain in water.
>
> I got some reasonable and converged results from iteration.
>
> There two candidates for convergence
>
> the red peak shows the rdf from atomistic simulation, and the green shows the 
> CG parameter candidates.
>
> step_127 results shows the similarity in absolute value and trend for all non 
> bond parameter except on absolute value of A-A rdf which shows 1st peak is 
> much large than 2nd peak
>
> step_128 shows the similar trend with the reference data, but the absolute 
> value is lower than the reference value comparing to step_127 data.
>
> which one could be more acceptable and what's the criteria??
It really depends what you want to do with the model later and if
reproducing the first & the second or the first solvation shell only
is more important in your case.

Christoph
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> 2018년 10월 18일 목요일 오전 12시 18분 24초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 7:18 AM changseo park <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I already contact with the author you mentioned. Thanks.
>> >
>> > For checking the dependency of non-bonded potential each other for any 
>> > system,
>> >
>> > If I changed the AA potential and the other non bonded rdf is consistent, 
>> > is it enough to say AA potential is independent to other potential?
>> >
>> > or still AA non bonded potential could be dependent on other non bonded 
>> > potential although the other rdf is consistent?
>> >
>> > How to check and validate that one non-bonded potential is independent on 
>> > others?
>> This is hard question and I don't know of a way to test that
>> definitely, but I would say potentials are usually NOT independent,
>> but maybe you are luck for your system.
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > 2018년 10월 17일 수요일 오후 10시 3분 30초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:41 AM changseo park <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > OK, the more RDF and averaging them will not help.
>> >> >
>> >> > About my system, PNIPAM in water, I'm working on CG parameterization 
>> >> > for 280K state which is Coil state based on All atom results( LOPLS + 
>> >> > TIP4P/2005)
>> >> >
>> >> > I confirmed that the all atom scale PNIPAM has extended structure at 
>> >> > 280K and collapsed structure at 320K statistically (300ns trajectory 
>> >> > and check the histogram of Rg).
>> >> >
>> >> > And I need the CG parameter only below the LCST(280K).
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > For non bonded parameter, can I converge the non-bonded parameter one 
>> >> > by one??
>> >> >
>> >> > In my system there are 3 bead and total 6 non bonded interaction.
>> >> >
>> >> > As trial, I tested only A-A non bonded interaction for IBI and I could 
>> >> > get the potential fully describe the A-A rdf while the IBI for total 6 
>> >> > non bonded convergence I couldn't. Can I use this as AA non bonded 
>> >> > potential??
>> >> >
>> >> > I think the potential AA BB CC AB BC AC should be independent? Correct?
>> >> >
>> >> > Although AB BC AC is dependent on AA BB CC, I think AA BB CC potential 
>> >> > should be independent
>> >> >
>> >> > actually, I saw the query that the nonbonded interaction is dependent, 
>> >> > but there was no exact explanation
>> >> >
>> >> > Plz attach reference or explain precisely about the reason.
>> >> All your questions are very system specific and not really related to
>> >> VOTCA itself, so sorry I am not the expert for PNIPAM nor am I a
>> >> personal tutor, you will have to figure these answers out by yourself.
>> >> If you need more information about coarse-graining of PNIPAM I would
>> >> advise you to contact the authors of  J. Phys. Chem. B 2018,  122,
>> >> 1516−1524.
>> >>
>> >> Christoph
>> >> >
>> >> > Always thanks to answer my question.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2018년 10월 17일 수요일 오전 2시 4분 35초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:57 AM changseo park <[email protected]> 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > After getting sum advice and searching several queries, I did IBI 
>> >> >> > for non-bonded, but still I couldn't get the converged non bonded 
>> >> >> > potential
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > My system composed of one 30m PNIPAM chain in dilute water. the 
>> >> >> > polymer chain composed of 3 bead per monomer so total 90 beads.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Since the PNIPAM has hydrophilic and hydrophobic part, the 
>> >> >> > conformation of polymer chain is changing, extended to collapsed. So 
>> >> >> > the rdf has broad and insignificant peak.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I got the rdf from NPT 300ns atomistic simulation as target and the 
>> >> >> > IBI process continues in NVT with sd for 10ns per iteration.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I used post update option smooth (with iteration 3) and scale (0.1) 
>> >> >> > and I also used do_potential options
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > for bonded potential, I used the results of Boltzmann inversion 
>> >> >> > potential.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > the attached file shows the target and new rdf for the system at 
>> >> >> > step_11 and step_30
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm following the method almost same as this paper with different 
>> >> >> > materials
>> >> >> > <J. Phys. Chem. B 2018,  122, 1516−1524>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > the convergence of nonbonded interaction is quite good for this 
>> >> >> > system, single PAM in water.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The cause for divergence is, I guess, the quality of RDF.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I wonder the convergence problem could be solved with better RDF, by 
>> >> >> > doing another 5set of atomistic simulation with 300ns and getting 
>> >> >> > the rdf from average value
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't think that will help, coarse-graining for a system with
>> >> >> different phases, like PNIPAM with open and collapsed, is just hard.
>> >> >> You might need to develop different coarse-grained potential for each
>> >> >> phase.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Christoph
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks in advance
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2018년 10월 6일 토요일 오전 1시 39분 53초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 7:11 AM changseo park <[email protected]> 
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks for quick answer!!
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Okay, the main criteria for convergence is to compare the 
>> >> >> >> > distribution function one by one with target function
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > In my case, the Convergence sum is start from 15000 and after 
>> >> >> >> > step 2, it varies from 3000~5000 in every step until more than 
>> >> >> >> > 300 step
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > when I compared the distribution function, the votca fits the 
>> >> >> >> > specific peak on the target and switch the specific peaks to 
>> >> >> >> > others again and again.  is it normal process for votca?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I am not 100% sure what you mean but it sounds to me like the IBI is
>> >> >> >> overshooting, so you should try to scale the update with the postupd
>> >> >> >> scale option.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > and, The peak location is similar but the y-value has absolute 
>> >> >> >> > difference comparing to the target, is it OK??
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > In addtion, I wonder the votca has the potential fixed options 
>> >> >> >> > which means that,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Q. If the A-A rdf shows good convergence comparing to the target 
>> >> >> >> > distribution, then can I fix the A-A non bonded CG parameter and 
>> >> >> >> > continue the iteration for other non bonded interaction? (A-B, 
>> >> >> >> > A-C ...etc)??
>> >> >> >> There is no automatic way to do that.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Since the iteration could be faster when we start from simple 
>> >> >> >> > parameterization to complicated parameterization, is there any 
>> >> >> >> > tips or advice for non bonded IBI instead of iteration for 6 
>> >> >> >> > nonbonded parameter at the same time.
>> >> >> >> > (for example, <do_potential> options etc....>
>> >> >> >> Yeah, you can update one potential per iteration step, using
>> >> >> >> do_potential "1 0 0 0 0 0" for the 1st potential and "0 1 0 0 0 0" 
>> >> >> >> for
>> >> >> >> the 2nd potential and so on.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Christoph
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Anyway, I really thank to develop votca^^
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > 2018년 10월 5일 금요일 오후 9시 17분 24초 UTC+9, Christoph Junghans 님의 말:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 6:12 AM changseo park 
>> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > TO. VOTCA users
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Hi, I'm new user for VOTCA.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > I'm researching about one single chain polymer conformation 
>> >> >> >> >> > change in water dilute system.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > I figured out all the errors based on queries on VOTCA and I 
>> >> >> >> >> > started the IBI step.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > For get CG non bonded parameter, I got the bonded interaction 
>> >> >> >> >> > from the csg_boltzmann and converted to the table form.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > There is no problem to do iteration for non-bonded interaction
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > However, the convergence sum is quite big for iteration.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > My convergence criteria is 0.5, but the usual convergence sum 
>> >> >> >> >> > is about 2000~3000.
>> >> >> >> >> The convergence value depends on a lot of things, e.g. # of
>> >> >> >> >> interactions, normalization etc., I would put too much belief in 
>> >> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> one number, just look at the RDFs in comparison to the targets 
>> >> >> >> >> and see
>> >> >> >> >> if they have converged.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Christoph
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > The attached files is about IBI for 6 RDF, non bonded 
>> >> >> >> >> > interaction (AA, AB, AC, BC, BB, CC)
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Plz give me advice to converge non bonded interaction
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks in advance
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> >> >> >> >> > Google Groups "votca" group.
>> >> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>> >> >> >> >> > it, send an email to [email protected].
>> >> >> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> >> >> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> >> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> >> >> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> >> >> >> > Google Groups "votca" group.
>> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> >> >> >> > send an email to [email protected].
>> >> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> >> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> >> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> >> > Groups "votca" group.
>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> >> >> > send an email to [email protected].
>> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> > Groups "votca" group.
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> >> > an email to [email protected].
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to