On 02-Apr-00, Chris Wiles wrote:
> 
>> Then why are the WarpJPEG/PNG datatypes much faster than any 68k
>> equivalent?
> 
> I thought they weren't, which is why I made the comment :)
> 
> I'm sure Neil Bothwick said that V's image decoding, using the optimised
> 060 image decoders was faster than using the PPC image decoders, under
> AWeb.
> 
> Mind you, I suppose this doesn't rule out that Olli's image decoder code,
> under PPC, maybe a tad faster (but maybe only a 'little' faster than
> optimised 060 libs). But, yep, as you said, perhaps it's not a priority as
> such (mainly due to the minor increase in speed).
> 
> Chris.

Hmm when you compare PPC datatypes and 68k ones, there is big difference in
speed. I can`t see the reason, why should be PPC image decoders slower.
Maybe bad written in Aweb ???
Kindly regards

                                                                            
               Vaclav Misek
-- 

                               The man of the dark and shadows
                           _____  __  __ __ ______ ____   ___   __
                          /  __/ / / / // // _   // __ \ /   \ / /
                         /\_ \  / /-/ // //  /  // / / // /--// /
                        /  /  \/ /-/ // //  /  // /_/ // /--// /
                        \_____/\/  \/ \/ \_/__/ \____//____/ \/

                                                                           
Team *AMIGA*

____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"

Reply via email to