Hi,
> > Then why are the WarpJPEG/PNG datatypes much faster than any 68k equivalent?
>
> I thought they weren't, which is why I made the comment :)
>
> I'm sure Neil Bothwick said that V's image decoding, using the optimised 060
> image decoders was faster than using the PPC image decoders, under AWeb.
I found his JPEG datatype to be very fast. It took less than 2 seconds
to display (via multiview) a 1024x768 image, whereas the OS3.5
(admittedly not 060 optimised) took 8-10 secs. Having said that
though, even voyage doesnt display them in less than 2 secs (after
downloading and browsing offline - to allow for the dowload time ;)
Cya,
Steven.
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
