On 10-02-17 01:04 PM, Toby Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Nathan Kidd <nathan-...@spicycrypto.ca
(Oh, I do have another word of advice: use git) :)
Just curious: are you using git-svn to perform git operations on an svn
repo, or just using git directly? How big of a team are you using git with?
I think it would make a lot of things much easier but my impression is
also that it requires a better understanding of version control methods
in general, and that's something that my team already struggles with
plenty, even on a centralized setup like SVN.
I'm using git-svn, mainly because I think your general impression is
correct: It requires a bit deeper, or perhaps just different,
understanding of version control, which is harder to sink in after years
of vss + svn. We have ~20 devs on svn, and those who want to use
git-svn on top.
Git-svn adds a fair bit of complexity over plain git, but is well worth
it. To me, git->svn is not as much a leap forward as vss->svn was, but
it somewhere in that magnitude because of the power of local commits +
'git rebase -i'.
If I were starting with a new team I would probably go with straight git.
-Nathan
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
