Am Montag, 18. September 2006 02:11 schrieb Christian Ohm: > On Monday, 18 September 2006 at 1:47, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > Am Montag, 18. September 2006 01:37 schrieb Christian Ohm: > > > On Monday, 18 September 2006 at 1:10, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > > Am Montag, 18. September 2006 01:06 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > > > > > Am Montag, 18. September 2006 00:41 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen: > > > > > > (why don't these mails have a Reply-To header?) > > > > > > > > > > PS: I changed the Reply-To (reply_goes_to_list option of Mailman) > > > > > from Poster to This list and it seems to work. > > > > > > > > PPS: Mailman says that everything but Poster is evil, because all > > > > sensible mail programs have a reply-to-list button. Sounds > > > > sensible... Do we agree? > > > > > > I agree (set Reply-To to the poster). > > > > Perhaps I should have stated it more clearly: Poster doesn't set > > anything. It keeps what has been supplied by the "poster".
> Now I am confused. Just keep the default, so a Reply goes to the poster, > and a List-Reply goes to the list. Ok, then you are 1:1 for and against the Reply-To-List setting... ;) We'll see what the others say. > > Quote from the Mailman help: > > --- > > reply_goes_to_list (general): Where are replies to list messages > > directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. > > This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in > > messages flowing through this mailing list. When set to Poster, no > > Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although if one is present in the > > original message, it is not stripped. Setting this value to either This > > list or Explicit address causes Mailman to insert a specific Reply-To: > > header in all messages, overriding the header in the original message if > > necessary (Explicit address inserts the value of reply_to_address). > > There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: header. > > One is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to convey > > their valid return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes it > > much more difficult to send private replies. See `Reply-To' Munging > > Considered Harmful for a general discussion of this issue. See Reply-To > > Munging Considered Useful for a dissenting opinion. > > Some mailing lists have restricted posting privileges, with a parallel > > list devoted to discussions. Examples are `patches' or `checkin' lists, > > where software changes are posted by a revision control system, but > > discussion about the changes occurs on a developers mailing list. To > > support these types of mailing lists, select Explicit address and set the > > Reply-To: address below to point to the parallel list. > > --- > > And perhaps you could set the Reply-To for the commit-list to the > dev-list Allready done. > (oh, and can you get Gna to attach the actual diffs to the > commit list?). Not possible. We can't modify that info as far as I know. The svnlog (I think that was the program) options are set by the Gna staff. We can't add any own hooks or modify existing ones. --Dennis
pgpWIseqO9d2M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
