-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Minor change: > > 1. Explanation, with ref to the readme.txt > 2. readme.txt > 3. GPLv2 No, please, do not include this file with the current name. It will be a source of confusion to no end. If you really want to include it as a separate file, you should atleast rename it to something else, like "pumpkin.txt". >> Source package - only GPL text inside COPYING file. >> Data package - GPL and original readme.txt inside COPYING file. > > Can we all agree on this form of distribution? > I'd still supply the Linux and Windows installer with everything included, > just the "raw material" would be seperated. Yes, raw material is all we need. As in separate SVN sections and separate source tarballs. In case somebody is wondering that this may complicate the development process, I must say that it is really quite the opposite. Not having to rebuild the data package every time you make minor changes to the engine is a really a good thing. Both for packagers and developers. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFJ63OztOe9mov/y4RAi8hAJ9bzJeLNkc+KSeBg9IDOOZy25PsDQCguQP+ xW0vHjh4FUWXYnpT/qSPGoM= =QBwh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
