Am Montag, 15. Januar 2007 21:26 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:26:20 -0500 Dennis Schridde > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi! > > > >I wanted to commit the copyright headers to the sourcecode files, > >which I > >forgot for 2.0.5, but I noticed that they say: > > > >Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Warzone Resurrection Project > > > >Now the "problem" is that 2005 there was no WZRP... An alternative > >idea > >is "Various authors", what doesn't sound well, either. > > > >So what is the general opinion? Use WZRP anyway, in the hope that > >no one of > >the older authors will object, or use various or use something > >different? > > > >--Dennis > > > >PS: I ask now, before commiting the header, because it is a lot > >easier to > >change the template file than to change all and every sourcecode > >file. ;) > > Why not leave the original Pumpkin (c), since you have to anyway? > They still own the copyright AFAIK. I did not intend to remove any copyright notices. I just added additional ones.
> Then just add 'source modification done by Warzone GPL & WRP' or > something like that. Or maybe "...done by the Warzone community" It now reads "2005-2007 Warzone Resurrection Project". If there are serious objections against this, I have to either reverse apply the commit and cat in a new header or do some sed magic... > Then in the AUTHORS file, go into more detail of who did what and > when if that matters? Well, then we would have to provide a complete SVN changelog of approx 1000+ commits inclusive diffs. Probably several dozens (if not hundreds) of MB. Nothing that would fit into an AUTHORS file. ;) --Dennis
pgpykAUfWSb9v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
